Improved test–retest reliability of R2* and susceptibility quantification using multishot multi-echo 3D EPI

Yujia Huang, Lin Chen, Xu Li, Jiaen Liu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the potential of 3D EPI for improving the reliability of (Formula presented.) -weighted data and quantification of (Formula presented.) decay rate and susceptibility (χ) compared with conventional gradient-echo (GRE)-based acquisition. Methods: Eight healthy subjects in a wide age range were recruited. Each subject received repeated scans for both GRE and EPI acquisitions with an isotropic 1 mm resolution at 3 T. Maps of (Formula presented.) and χ were quantified, and their interscan differences were used to evaluate the test–retest reliability. Interprotocol differences of (Formula presented.) and χ between GRE and EPI were also measured voxel by voxel and in selected regions of interest to test the consistency between the two acquisition methods. Results: The quantifications of (Formula presented.) and χ using EPI protocols showed increased test–retest reliability with higher EPI factors up to 5 as performed in the experiment and were consistent with those based on GRE. Conclusion: The result suggests that multishot multi-echo 3D EPI can be a useful alternative acquisition method for (Formula presented.) -weighted MRI and quantification of (Formula presented.) and χ with reduced scan time, improved test–retest reliability, and similar accuracy compared with commonly used 3D GRE.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2310-2319
Number of pages10
JournalMagnetic resonance in medicine
Volume91
Issue number6
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2023

Keywords

  • 3D EPI
  • 3D GRE
  • QSM
  • R
  • T-weighted MRI
  • test–retest reliability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Improved test–retest reliability of R2* and susceptibility quantification using multishot multi-echo 3D EPI'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this