TY - JOUR
T1 - Importance of determining indication for colonoscopy
T2 - Implications for Practice and Policy
AU - Singal, Amit G.
AU - Gupta, Samir
AU - Lee, Jeffrey
AU - Halm, Ethan A.
AU - Rutter, Carolyn M.
AU - Corley, Douglas
AU - Inadomi, John
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding This study was conducted as part of the National Cancer Institute–funded consortium Population-Based Research Optimizing Screening through Personalized Regiments, with support from the National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute ( U54CA163308-01 ). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 by the AGA Institute.
PY - 2014/12/1
Y1 - 2014/12/1
N2 - Precise diagnostic coding of procedures is of critical importance for accurate billing, determination of patient co-pays and deductibles, retrospective analysis of results, and development of performance metrics. For example, whether a colonoscopy is coded as diagnostic or therapeutic, screening or surveillance has important implications for determining patient's personal cost, deriving an endoscopists' adenoma detection rate and understanding appropriate use of the procedure. In this month's "Practice Management: The Road Ahead" article, Dr. Amit G. Singal and colleagues help us wade through the terminology and implications of procedural coding. As more refined electronic reporting systems are developed, we hope that standardization of terminology becomes more robust. Only with a more standardized coding and indication documentation can we hope to derive accurate population level information.
AB - Precise diagnostic coding of procedures is of critical importance for accurate billing, determination of patient co-pays and deductibles, retrospective analysis of results, and development of performance metrics. For example, whether a colonoscopy is coded as diagnostic or therapeutic, screening or surveillance has important implications for determining patient's personal cost, deriving an endoscopists' adenoma detection rate and understanding appropriate use of the procedure. In this month's "Practice Management: The Road Ahead" article, Dr. Amit G. Singal and colleagues help us wade through the terminology and implications of procedural coding. As more refined electronic reporting systems are developed, we hope that standardization of terminology becomes more robust. Only with a more standardized coding and indication documentation can we hope to derive accurate population level information.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84955566243&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84955566243&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.09.028
DO - 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.09.028
M3 - Article
C2 - 25606584
AN - SCOPUS:84955566243
SN - 1542-3565
VL - 12
SP - 1958-1963.e3
JO - Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
JF - Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
IS - 12
ER -