Imaging of uncommon retroperitoneal masses

Prabhakar Rajiah, Rakesh Sinha, Carlos Cuevas, Theodore J. Dubinsky, William H. Bush, Orpheus Kolokythas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

190 Scopus citations


Retroperitoneal masses not arising from major solid organs are uncommon. Although there is no simple method of classifying retroperitoneal masses, a reasonable approach is to consider the masses as predominantly solid or cystic and to subdivide these into neoplastic and nonneoplastic masses. Because the treatment options vary, it is useful to be able to differentiate these masses by using imaging criteria. Although the differential diagnosis of retroperitoneal masses can be narrowed down to a certain extent on the basis of imaging characteristics, patterns of involvement, and demographics, there is still a considerable overlap of imaging findings for these masses, and histologic examination is often required for definitive diagnosis. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging play an important role in characterization and in the assessment of the extent of the disease and involvement of adjacent and distant structures. Familiarity with the CT and MR imaging features of various retroperitoneal masses will facilitate accurate diagnosis and staging for aggressive lesions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)949-976
Number of pages28
Issue number4
StatePublished - Jul 1 2011

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging


Dive into the research topics of 'Imaging of uncommon retroperitoneal masses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this