ICP Versus Laser Doppler Cerebrovascular Reactivity Indices to Assess Brain Autoregulatory Capacity

F. A. Zeiler, J. Donnelly, D. Cardim, D. K. Menon, P. Smielewski, M. Czosnyka

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

23 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: To explore the relationship between various autoregulatory indices in order to determine which approximate small vessel/microvascular (MV) autoregulatory capacity most accurately. Methods: Utilizing a retrospective cohort of traumatic brain injury patients (N = 41) with: transcranial Doppler (TCD), intracranial pressure (ICP) and cortical laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF), we calculated various continuous indices of autoregulation and cerebrovascular responsiveness: A. ICP derived [pressure reactivity index (PRx)—correlation between ICP and mean arterial pressure (MAP), PAx—correlation between pulse amplitude of ICP (AMP) and MAP, RAC—correlation between AMP and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP)], B. TCD derived (Mx—correlation between mean flow velocity (FVm) and CPP, Mx_a—correlation between FVm and MAP, Sx—correlation between systolic flow velocity (FVs) and CPP, Sx_a—correlation between FVs and MAP, Dx—correlation between diastolic flow index (FVd) and CPP, Dx_a—correlation between FVd and MAP], and LDF derived (Lx—correlation between LDF cerebral blood flow [CBF] and CPP, Lx_a—correlation between LDF-CBF and MAP). We assessed the relationship between these indices via Pearson correlation, Friedman test, principal component analysis (PCA), agglomerative hierarchal clustering (AHC), and k-means cluster analysis (KMCA). Results: LDF-based autoregulatory index (Lx) was most associated with TCD-based Mx/Mx_a and Dx/Dx_a across Pearson correlation, PCA, AHC, and KMCA. Lx was only remotely associated with ICP-based indices (PRx, PAx, RAC). TCD-based Sx/Sx_a was more closely associated with ICP-derived PRx, PAx and RAC. This indicates that vascular-derived indices of autoregulatory capacity (i.e., TCD and LDF based) covary, with Sx/Sx_a being the exception, whereas indices of cerebrovascular reactivity derived from pulsatile CBV (i.e., ICP indices) appear to not be closely related to those of vascular origin. Conclusions: Transcranial Doppler Mx is the most closely associated with LDF-based Lx/Lx_a. Both Sx/Sx-a and the ICP-derived indices appear to be dissociated with LDF-based cerebrovascular reactivity, leaving Mx/Mx-a as a better surrogate for the assessment of cortical small vessel/MV cerebrovascular reactivity. Sx/Sx_a cocluster/covary with ICP-derived indices, as seen in our previous work.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)194-202
Number of pages9
JournalNeurocritical Care
Volume28
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2018
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Autoregulation
  • Cerebrovascular reactivity
  • Covariance
  • ICP index
  • Laser Doppler
  • Machine learning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
  • Clinical Neurology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'ICP Versus Laser Doppler Cerebrovascular Reactivity Indices to Assess Brain Autoregulatory Capacity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this