TY - JOUR
T1 - How Well Does the Extended Linear Interaction Energy Method Perform in Accurate Binding Free Energy Calculations?
AU - Hao, Dongxiao
AU - He, Xibing
AU - Ji, Beihong
AU - Zhang, Shengli
AU - Wang, Junmei
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors gratefully acknowledge the funding support from the National Science Foundation (NSF) and National Institutes of Health (NIH) to J.W. (NSF 1955260, NIH R01GM079383, and NIH P30DA035778) and from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 11774279, 11774280) to S.Z. The authors also thank for the computing resources provided by the Center for Research Computing (CRC) at the University of Pittsburgh.
Funding Information:
The authors gratefully acknowledge the funding support from the National Science Foundation (NSF) and National Institutes of Health (NIH) to J.W. (NSF 1955260, NIH R01GM079383, and NIH P30DA035778) and from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 11774279, 11774280) to S.Z. The authors also thank for the computing resources provided by the Center for Research Computing (CRC) at the University of Pittsburgh.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 American Chemical Society. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/12/28
Y1 - 2020/12/28
N2 - With continually increased computer power, molecular mechanics force field-based approaches, such as the endpoint methods of molecular mechanics Poisson-Boltzmann surface area (MM-PBSA) and molecular mechanics generalized Born surface area (MM-GBSA), have been routinely applied in both drug lead identification and optimization. However, the MM-PB/GBSA method is not as accurate as the pathway-based alchemical free energy methods, such as thermodynamic integration (TI) or free energy perturbation (FEP). Although the pathway-based methods are more rigorous in theory, they suffer from slow convergence and computational cost. Moreover, choosing adequate perturbation routes is also crucial for the pathway-based methods. Recently, we proposed a new method, coined extended linear interaction energy (ELIE) method, to overcome some disadvantages of the MM-PB/GBSA method to improve the accuracy of binding free energy calculation. In this work, we have systematically assessed this approach using in total 229 protein-ligand complexes for eight protein targets. Our results showed that ELIE performed much better than the molecular docking and MM-PBSA method in terms of root-mean-square error (RMSE), correlation coefficient (R), predictive index (PI), and Kendall's τ. The mean values of PI, R, and τ are 0.62, 0.58, and 0.44 for ELIE calculations. We also explored the impact of the length of simulation, ranging from 1 to 100 ns, on the performance of binding free energy calculation. In general, extending simulation length up to 25 ns could significantly improve the performance of ELIE, while longer molecular dynamics (MD) simulation does not always perform better than short MD simulation. Considering both the computational efficiency and achieved accuracy, ELIE is adequate in filling the gap between the efficient docking methods and computationally demanding alchemical free energy methods. Therefore, ELIE provides a practical solution for the routine ranking of compounds in lead optimization.
AB - With continually increased computer power, molecular mechanics force field-based approaches, such as the endpoint methods of molecular mechanics Poisson-Boltzmann surface area (MM-PBSA) and molecular mechanics generalized Born surface area (MM-GBSA), have been routinely applied in both drug lead identification and optimization. However, the MM-PB/GBSA method is not as accurate as the pathway-based alchemical free energy methods, such as thermodynamic integration (TI) or free energy perturbation (FEP). Although the pathway-based methods are more rigorous in theory, they suffer from slow convergence and computational cost. Moreover, choosing adequate perturbation routes is also crucial for the pathway-based methods. Recently, we proposed a new method, coined extended linear interaction energy (ELIE) method, to overcome some disadvantages of the MM-PB/GBSA method to improve the accuracy of binding free energy calculation. In this work, we have systematically assessed this approach using in total 229 protein-ligand complexes for eight protein targets. Our results showed that ELIE performed much better than the molecular docking and MM-PBSA method in terms of root-mean-square error (RMSE), correlation coefficient (R), predictive index (PI), and Kendall's τ. The mean values of PI, R, and τ are 0.62, 0.58, and 0.44 for ELIE calculations. We also explored the impact of the length of simulation, ranging from 1 to 100 ns, on the performance of binding free energy calculation. In general, extending simulation length up to 25 ns could significantly improve the performance of ELIE, while longer molecular dynamics (MD) simulation does not always perform better than short MD simulation. Considering both the computational efficiency and achieved accuracy, ELIE is adequate in filling the gap between the efficient docking methods and computationally demanding alchemical free energy methods. Therefore, ELIE provides a practical solution for the routine ranking of compounds in lead optimization.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85097881959&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85097881959&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00934
DO - 10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00934
M3 - Article
C2 - 33213150
AN - SCOPUS:85097881959
SN - 1549-9596
VL - 60
SP - 6624
EP - 6633
JO - Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
JF - Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
IS - 12
ER -