TY - JOUR
T1 - Hemodynamics and gas exchange during chest compressions in neonatal resuscitation
AU - Vali, Payam
AU - Chandrasekharan, Praveen
AU - Rawat, Munmun
AU - Gugino, Sylvia
AU - Koenigsknecht, Carmon
AU - Helman, Justin
AU - Mathew, Bobby
AU - Berkelhamer, Sara
AU - Nair, Jayasree
AU - Wyckoff, Myra
AU - Lakshminrusimha, Satyan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Vali et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
PY - 2017/4
Y1 - 2017/4
N2 - Purpose Current knowledge about pulmonary/systemic hemodynamics and gas exchange during neonatal resuscitation in a model of transitioning fetal circulation with fetal shunts and fluidfilled alveoli is limited. Using a fetal lamb asphyxia model, we sought to determine whether hemodynamic or gas-exchange parameters predicted successful return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Methods The umbilical cord was occluded in 22 lambs to induce asphyxial cardiac arrest. Following five minutes of asystole, resuscitation as per AHA-Neonatal Resuscitation Program guidelines was initiated. Hemodynamic parameters and serial arterial blood gases were assessed during resuscitation. Results ROSC occurred in 18 lambs (82%) at a median (IQR) time of 120 (105-180) seconds. There were no differences in hemodynamic parameters at baseline and at any given time point during resuscitation between the lambs that achieved ROSC and those that did not. Blood gases at arrest prior to resuscitation were comparable between groups. However, lambs that achieved ROSC had lower PaO2, higher PaCO2, and lower lactate during resuscitation. Increase in diastolic blood pressures induced by epinephrine in lambs that achieved ROSC (11 4 mmHg) did not differ from those that were not resuscitated (10+6 mmHg). Low diastolic blood pressures were adequate to achieve ROSC. Conclusions Hemodynamic parameters in a neonatal lamb asphyxia model with transitioning circulation did not predict success of ROSC. Lactic acidosis, higher PaO2 and lower PaCO2 observed in the lambs that did not achieve ROSC may represent a state of inadequate tissue perfusion and/or mitochondrial dysfunction.
AB - Purpose Current knowledge about pulmonary/systemic hemodynamics and gas exchange during neonatal resuscitation in a model of transitioning fetal circulation with fetal shunts and fluidfilled alveoli is limited. Using a fetal lamb asphyxia model, we sought to determine whether hemodynamic or gas-exchange parameters predicted successful return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Methods The umbilical cord was occluded in 22 lambs to induce asphyxial cardiac arrest. Following five minutes of asystole, resuscitation as per AHA-Neonatal Resuscitation Program guidelines was initiated. Hemodynamic parameters and serial arterial blood gases were assessed during resuscitation. Results ROSC occurred in 18 lambs (82%) at a median (IQR) time of 120 (105-180) seconds. There were no differences in hemodynamic parameters at baseline and at any given time point during resuscitation between the lambs that achieved ROSC and those that did not. Blood gases at arrest prior to resuscitation were comparable between groups. However, lambs that achieved ROSC had lower PaO2, higher PaCO2, and lower lactate during resuscitation. Increase in diastolic blood pressures induced by epinephrine in lambs that achieved ROSC (11 4 mmHg) did not differ from those that were not resuscitated (10+6 mmHg). Low diastolic blood pressures were adequate to achieve ROSC. Conclusions Hemodynamic parameters in a neonatal lamb asphyxia model with transitioning circulation did not predict success of ROSC. Lactic acidosis, higher PaO2 and lower PaCO2 observed in the lambs that did not achieve ROSC may represent a state of inadequate tissue perfusion and/or mitochondrial dysfunction.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018808450&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85018808450&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0176478
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0176478
M3 - Article
C2 - 28441439
AN - SCOPUS:85018808450
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 12
JO - PLoS One
JF - PLoS One
IS - 4
M1 - e0176478
ER -