TY - JOUR
T1 - Functional neuroanatomy of gesture–speech integration in children varies with individual differences in gesture processing
AU - Demir-Lira, Özlem Ece
AU - Asaridou, Salomi S.
AU - Raja Beharelle, Anjali
AU - Holt, Anna E.
AU - Goldin-Meadow, Susan
AU - Small, Steven L.
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding information The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), Grant P01 HD040605, and the National Institute of Deafness and other Communication Disorders (NIDCD), Grant R01 DC003378 This research was supported by two institutes of the National Institutes of Health (NIH)?the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) under Grant P01 HD040605 (Goldin-Meadow and Small are PIs) and the National Institute of Deafness and other Communication Disorders (NIDCD) under Grant R01 DC003378. Their support is gratefully acknowledged. We also wish to thank Susan Duncan and Manali Khadilkar for carefully reading and editing an earlier version of this manuscript, Kristi Schonwald for her coordination of the entire project, and Virginia Li for running the fMRI acquisitions. We gratefully acknowledge the efforts of the children and families who participated and who sacrificed their personal time to help us learn about the neurobiology of language development.
Funding Information:
This research was supported by two institutes of the National Institutes of Health (NIH)—the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) under Grant P01 HD040605 (Goldin-Meadow and Small are PIs) and the National Institute of Deafness and other Communication Disorders (NIDCD) under
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd
PY - 2018/9
Y1 - 2018/9
N2 - Gesture is an integral part of children's communicative repertoire. However, little is known about the neurobiology of speech and gesture integration in the developing brain. We investigated how 8- to 10-year-old children processed gesture that was essential to understanding a set of narratives. We asked whether the functional neuroanatomy of gesture–speech integration varies as a function of (1) the content of speech, and/or (2) individual differences in how gesture is processed. When gestures provided missing information not present in the speech (i.e., disambiguating gesture; e.g., “pet” + flapping palms = bird), the presence of gesture led to increased activity in inferior frontal gyri, the right middle temporal gyrus, and the left superior temporal gyrus, compared to when gesture provided redundant information (i.e., reinforcing gesture; e.g., “bird” + flapping palms = bird). This pattern of activation was found only in children who were able to successfully integrate gesture and speech behaviorally, as indicated by their performance on post-test story comprehension questions. Children who did not glean meaning from gesture did not show differential activation across the two conditions. Our results suggest that the brain activation pattern for gesture–speech integration in children overlaps with—but is broader than—the pattern in adults performing the same task. Overall, our results provide a possible neurobiological mechanism that could underlie children's increasing ability to integrate gesture and speech over childhood, and account for individual differences in that integration.
AB - Gesture is an integral part of children's communicative repertoire. However, little is known about the neurobiology of speech and gesture integration in the developing brain. We investigated how 8- to 10-year-old children processed gesture that was essential to understanding a set of narratives. We asked whether the functional neuroanatomy of gesture–speech integration varies as a function of (1) the content of speech, and/or (2) individual differences in how gesture is processed. When gestures provided missing information not present in the speech (i.e., disambiguating gesture; e.g., “pet” + flapping palms = bird), the presence of gesture led to increased activity in inferior frontal gyri, the right middle temporal gyrus, and the left superior temporal gyrus, compared to when gesture provided redundant information (i.e., reinforcing gesture; e.g., “bird” + flapping palms = bird). This pattern of activation was found only in children who were able to successfully integrate gesture and speech behaviorally, as indicated by their performance on post-test story comprehension questions. Children who did not glean meaning from gesture did not show differential activation across the two conditions. Our results suggest that the brain activation pattern for gesture–speech integration in children overlaps with—but is broader than—the pattern in adults performing the same task. Overall, our results provide a possible neurobiological mechanism that could underlie children's increasing ability to integrate gesture and speech over childhood, and account for individual differences in that integration.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85043385638&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85043385638&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/desc.12648
DO - 10.1111/desc.12648
M3 - Article
C2 - 29516653
AN - SCOPUS:85043385638
SN - 1363-755X
VL - 21
JO - Developmental Science
JF - Developmental Science
IS - 5
M1 - e12648
ER -