TY - JOUR
T1 - Frequency of rare, serious donor reactions
T2 - International perspective
AU - the Biomedical Excellence for Safer Transfusion (BEST) Collaborative
AU - Young, Pampee
AU - Crowder, Lauren
AU - Steele, Whitney
AU - Irving, David
AU - Pink, Joanne
AU - Kutner, Jose Mauro
AU - Yokoyama, Ana Paula Hitomi
AU - Van Buren, Nancy
AU - O'Sullivan, Nicholas William
AU - Sayers, Merlyn
AU - Alcantara, Ramir Moreno
AU - van den Hurk, Katja
AU - Wiersum-Osselton, Johanna
AU - Shaz, Beth
N1 - Funding Information:
Marc Germain and Yves Gr?goire from H?ma-Qu?bec. Hany Kamel and Ralph Vassallo from Vitalant, and Sheila O-Brien and Mindy Goldman from Canadian Blood Services as these centers provided data without imputability. This work was supported by Biomedical Excellence for Safer Transfusion Collaborative.
Funding Information:
Marc Germain and Yves Grégoire from Héma‐Québec. Hany Kamel and Ralph Vassallo from Vitalant, and Sheila O‐Brien and Mindy Goldman from Canadian Blood Services as these centers provided data without imputability. This work was supported by Biomedical Excellence for Safer Transfusion Collaborative.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 AABB
PY - 2021/6
Y1 - 2021/6
N2 - Background: Severe blood donor adverse events are rare, but due to their rarity studying them can be difficult. To get an accurate estimate of their frequency and rate in the donor population it may be necessary to combine donation data across countries. Study Design and Methods: International blood collection organizations (BCOs) provided data on rare/severe donor reactions as well as denominator information for their donor populations from 2015 to 2017. Donor reactions were classified using standardized definitions. Results: BCOs from six countries provided reaction data for more than 22 million donations. A total of 480 rare reactions were reported of which 76.7% were imputed as definite and 11% probable. Rates of rare reactions were higher in females and first-time donors. Systemic rare reactions were the most common reaction type, accounting for over three quarters of reactions reported. Of systemic reactions, vasovagal reactions with loss of consciousness and injury or off-site (n = 350) made up the majority and occurred 1.53 per 100,000 donations. For the 22.3% that were localized reactions, the majority of these were cellulitis (n = 71, 0.31 per 100,000 donations) followed by deep venous thrombosis (n = 21, 0.09 per 100,000 donations). Conclusion: Pulling together data from multiple BCOs across countries allows for a better understanding of rare reactions, such as vasovagal reaction with injury or cellulitis, and for generating a reliable incidence rate for air embolism or compartment syndrome. However, gaps remain due to missing elements such as unknown donor status or location of reaction.
AB - Background: Severe blood donor adverse events are rare, but due to their rarity studying them can be difficult. To get an accurate estimate of their frequency and rate in the donor population it may be necessary to combine donation data across countries. Study Design and Methods: International blood collection organizations (BCOs) provided data on rare/severe donor reactions as well as denominator information for their donor populations from 2015 to 2017. Donor reactions were classified using standardized definitions. Results: BCOs from six countries provided reaction data for more than 22 million donations. A total of 480 rare reactions were reported of which 76.7% were imputed as definite and 11% probable. Rates of rare reactions were higher in females and first-time donors. Systemic rare reactions were the most common reaction type, accounting for over three quarters of reactions reported. Of systemic reactions, vasovagal reactions with loss of consciousness and injury or off-site (n = 350) made up the majority and occurred 1.53 per 100,000 donations. For the 22.3% that were localized reactions, the majority of these were cellulitis (n = 71, 0.31 per 100,000 donations) followed by deep venous thrombosis (n = 21, 0.09 per 100,000 donations). Conclusion: Pulling together data from multiple BCOs across countries allows for a better understanding of rare reactions, such as vasovagal reaction with injury or cellulitis, and for generating a reliable incidence rate for air embolism or compartment syndrome. However, gaps remain due to missing elements such as unknown donor status or location of reaction.
KW - adverse events
KW - blood donation
KW - donation complications
KW - donor reactions
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85102082209&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85102082209&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/trf.16333
DO - 10.1111/trf.16333
M3 - Article
C2 - 33665853
AN - SCOPUS:85102082209
SN - 0041-1132
VL - 61
SP - 1780
EP - 1788
JO - Transfusion
JF - Transfusion
IS - 6
ER -