Failure to Normalize Risk Profile of Spine Fusion Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Previously Treated With Percutaneous Stent Revascularization

Waleed Ahmad, Joshua Bell, Oscar Krol, Lara Passfall, Pramod Kamalapathy, Bailey Imbo, Peter Tretiakov, Tyler Williamson, Rachel Joujon-Roche, Kevin Moattari, Nicholas Kummer, Shaleen Vira, Virginie Lafage, Carl Paulino, Andrew J. Schoenfeld, Bassel Diebo, Hamid Hassanzadeh, Peter Passias

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: The impact of an initially less invasive cardiac intervention on outcomes of future surgical spine procedures has been understudied; therefore, we sought to investigate the effect of coronary stents on postoperative outcomes in an elective spine fusion cohort. Methods: Elective spine fusion patients were isolated with International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Edition and current procedural terminology procedure codes in the PearlDiver database. Patients were stratified by number of coronary stents: (1) 1 to 2 stents (ST12); (2) 3 to 4 stents (ST34); (3) no stents. Mean comparison tests compared differences in demographics, diagnoses, comorbidities, and 30-day and 90-day complication outcomes. Logistic regression assessed the odds of complications associated with coronary stents, controlling for levels fused, age, sex, and comorbidities (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]). Statistical significance was P < 0.05. Results: A total of 726,061 elective spine fusion patients were isolated. Of those patients, 707,396 patients had no stent, 17,087 ST12, and 1578 ST34. At baseline (BL), ST12 patients had higher rates of morbid obesity, chronic kidney disease, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and diabetes mellitus compared with no stent and ST34 patients (all P < 0.001). Relative to no stent patients, ST12 patients had a longer length of stay and, at 30 days, significantly higher complication rates, including pneumonia, myocardial infarction (MI), sepsis, acute kidney injury, urinary tract infection (UTI), wound complications, transfusions, and 30-day readmissions (P < 0.05). Controlling for age, sex, comorbidities, and levels fused, ST12 was a significant predictor of MI within 30 days (OR 2.15 [95% CI 1.7–2.7], P < 0.001) and 90 days postoperatively (OR 1.87 [95% CI 1.6–2.2], P < 0.001). ST34 patients compared with no stent patients at 30 days presented with increased rates of complication, including pneumonia, MI, sepsis, UTI, wound complications, and 30-day readmissions. Regression analysis showed no significant differences in complications between ST12 vs ST34 at 30 days, but at 90 days, ST34 was associated with significantly increased rate and odds of death (1.1% vs 0.3%, P = 0.021; OR 1.94 [95% CI 1.13–3.13], P = 0.01). Conclusion: Cardiac stents failed to normalize risk profile of patients with coronary artery disease. Postoperatively at 90 days, elective spine fusion patients with 3 or more stents were significantly at risk of mortality compared with patients with fewer or no stents.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)139-145
Number of pages7
JournalInternational Journal of Spine Surgery
Volume17
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2023

Keywords

  • cardiac
  • risk
  • spine deformity
  • spine surgery
  • stent

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Failure to Normalize Risk Profile of Spine Fusion Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Previously Treated With Percutaneous Stent Revascularization'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this