TY - JOUR
T1 - Experience with transumbilical breast augmentation
AU - Sudarsky, L.
AU - Doerr, Jr
AU - Lee, A. W.P.
AU - Bartlett, S.
AU - Schwarz, G.
PY - 2001
Y1 - 2001
N2 - Transumbilical breast augmentation (TUBA), an endoscopic-assisted procedure in which saline breast prostheses are inserted through the umbilicus, is a patient-driven, frequently performed procedure that remains controversial. The author describes the operative technique and results in 90 patients who underwent TUBA between October 1996 and July 2000 by the same surgeon in a community practice. A total of 85 patients underwent submammary TUBA and 5 patients underwent submuscular TUBA. Seventy patients were available for follow-up. Postoperative results of the 70 patients were graded as very good in 56 (80%), good in 12 (17%), and fair in 2 (2.9%). Complications were conversion to an open approach in 1 patient and an accidental submuscular entry into the pocket in 1 patient. There were four capsular contractures (5.7%), 5 patients (7.1%) were reoperated: 2 for capsulectomies, 1 for implant buckling, 1 for scar revision, and 1 for removal of the implants. There were no implant ruptures, hematomas, or infections. Advantages of TUBA include minimal scarring, remote incision, short operating time, low capsular contracture rate, and rapid recovery. These results of this evolving procedure suggest that in select patients TUBA provides a high level of patient satisfaction and low complication rates. As TUBA techniques for submuscular placement continue to develop, more patients may become TUBA candidates.
AB - Transumbilical breast augmentation (TUBA), an endoscopic-assisted procedure in which saline breast prostheses are inserted through the umbilicus, is a patient-driven, frequently performed procedure that remains controversial. The author describes the operative technique and results in 90 patients who underwent TUBA between October 1996 and July 2000 by the same surgeon in a community practice. A total of 85 patients underwent submammary TUBA and 5 patients underwent submuscular TUBA. Seventy patients were available for follow-up. Postoperative results of the 70 patients were graded as very good in 56 (80%), good in 12 (17%), and fair in 2 (2.9%). Complications were conversion to an open approach in 1 patient and an accidental submuscular entry into the pocket in 1 patient. There were four capsular contractures (5.7%), 5 patients (7.1%) were reoperated: 2 for capsulectomies, 1 for implant buckling, 1 for scar revision, and 1 for removal of the implants. There were no implant ruptures, hematomas, or infections. Advantages of TUBA include minimal scarring, remote incision, short operating time, low capsular contracture rate, and rapid recovery. These results of this evolving procedure suggest that in select patients TUBA provides a high level of patient satisfaction and low complication rates. As TUBA techniques for submuscular placement continue to develop, more patients may become TUBA candidates.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035047040&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035047040&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/00000637-200105000-00002
DO - 10.1097/00000637-200105000-00002
M3 - Article
C2 - 11352417
AN - SCOPUS:0035047040
SN - 0148-7043
VL - 46
SP - 467
EP - 473
JO - Annals of Plastic Surgery
JF - Annals of Plastic Surgery
IS - 5
ER -