Evaluator Training and Reliability for SMA Global Nusinersen Trials

Allan M. Glanzmana, Elena S. Mazzone, Sally Dunaway Young, Richard Gee, Kristy Rose, Anna Mayhew, Leslie Nelson, Chris Yun, Katie Alexander, Basil T. Darras, Zarazuela Zolkipli-Cunningham, Gihan Tennekoon, John W. Day, Richard S. Finkel, Eugenio Mercuri, Darryl C. De Vivo, Ron Baldwin, Kathie M. Bishop, Jacqueline Montes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

33 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Training methodology was established to optimize reliability of outcome measures in the nusinersen clinical trials. The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Infant Test of Neuromuscular Disorders (CHOP INTEND), Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale Expanded (HFMSE), and Revised Upper Limb (RULM) were primary or secondary outcomes. Methods: Video review, quarterly conference calls, and item scoring checks supported evaluator competence. Baseline and screening along with video review established intra and inter-rater reliability. Results: Inter and intra-rater reliability were both excellent. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) ranged between 0.906-0.994 across initial training meetings and 0.824-0.996 across annual retraining meetings. This was similar for CHOP INTEND (ICC = 0.824-0.951), HFMSE (ICC = 0.981-0.996), and RULM (ICC = 0.966-0.990). Intra-rater reliability for the CHOP INTEND, HFMSE, and RULM were ICC = 0.895 (95%CI: 0.852-0.926; n = 116), ICC = 0.959 (95%CI: 0.942-0.971; n = 125), and ICC = 0.948 (95%CI: 0.927-0.963; n = 126) respectively.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)159-166
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Neuromuscular Diseases
Volume5
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2018

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluator Training and Reliability for SMA Global Nusinersen Trials'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this