TY - JOUR
T1 - Electrostimulation for the prevention of deep venous thrombosis in patients with major trauma
T2 - A prospective randomized study
AU - Velmahos, George C.
AU - Petrone, Patrizio
AU - Chan, Linda S.
AU - Hanks, Sue Ellen
AU - Brown, Carlos V.
AU - Demetriades, Demetrios
N1 - Funding Information:
Supported in part by Bexley Trading Inc, San Rafael, Calif.
Copyright:
Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2005/5
Y1 - 2005/5
N2 - Background. Current methods of posttraumatic thromboprophylaxis (heparins and sequential compression devices) are inadequate. New methods should be tested. Muscle electrostimulation (MEST) has been used over the years with mixed - but predominantly encouraging - results for a variety of conditions, including prevention of deep venous thrombosis (DVT). It has not been tested in multiple trauma patients. Methods. Trauma patients with Injury Severity Score higher than 9 who were admitted to the intensive care unit and had a contraindication for prophylactic heparinization were randomized to groups MEST and control. MEST patients received 30-minute MEST sessions twice daily for 7 to 14 days. Venous flow velocity and venous diameter were measured by duplex venous scan. Venography - or, if not available, duplex - was used to evaluate the presence of proximal and peripheral DVT between days 7 and 15. Results. After exclusions, 26 MEST and 21 control patients completed the study and received outcome evaluation by venography (25) or duplex (22). Three patients in each group developed proximal DVT (11.5% vs 14%, P =. 79), and an additional 4 (15%) MEST group and 3 (14%) control group patients developed peripheral DVT (P =. 96). There was no difference in venous flow velocity or venous diameter between the groups. Conclusions. MEST was not effective in decreasing DVT rates in major trauma patients.
AB - Background. Current methods of posttraumatic thromboprophylaxis (heparins and sequential compression devices) are inadequate. New methods should be tested. Muscle electrostimulation (MEST) has been used over the years with mixed - but predominantly encouraging - results for a variety of conditions, including prevention of deep venous thrombosis (DVT). It has not been tested in multiple trauma patients. Methods. Trauma patients with Injury Severity Score higher than 9 who were admitted to the intensive care unit and had a contraindication for prophylactic heparinization were randomized to groups MEST and control. MEST patients received 30-minute MEST sessions twice daily for 7 to 14 days. Venous flow velocity and venous diameter were measured by duplex venous scan. Venography - or, if not available, duplex - was used to evaluate the presence of proximal and peripheral DVT between days 7 and 15. Results. After exclusions, 26 MEST and 21 control patients completed the study and received outcome evaluation by venography (25) or duplex (22). Three patients in each group developed proximal DVT (11.5% vs 14%, P =. 79), and an additional 4 (15%) MEST group and 3 (14%) control group patients developed peripheral DVT (P =. 96). There was no difference in venous flow velocity or venous diameter between the groups. Conclusions. MEST was not effective in decreasing DVT rates in major trauma patients.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=18144416154&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=18144416154&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.surg.2005.01.010
DO - 10.1016/j.surg.2005.01.010
M3 - Article
C2 - 15855919
AN - SCOPUS:18144416154
SN - 0039-6060
VL - 137
SP - 493
EP - 498
JO - Surgery (United States)
JF - Surgery (United States)
IS - 5
ER -