TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of Low Intensity Focused Ultrasound on Liposomes Containing Channel proteins
AU - Babakhanian, Meghedi
AU - Yang, Limin
AU - Nowroozi, Bryan
AU - Saddik, George
AU - Boodaghians, Lilian
AU - Blount, Paul
AU - Grundfest, Warren
N1 - Funding Information:
P.B. was supported by Grant I-1420 of the Welch Foundation, Grant RP130362 from the Cancer Prevention & Research Institute of Texas (CPRIT; http://www.cprit.state.tx.us/), and Grant GM061028 and GM121780 from the National Institutes of Health. W.G. was supported by Jean Perkins Foundation, UCLA travel fellowship and Journal of Cell Science travel grant. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health or other funding organizations. The statistical analysis was supported by CTSI grant UL1TR000124UCLA (Clinical and Translational Science Institute), Department of Medicine Statistics Core. The authors would like to thank Drs. Yee Ling Lam from Youxing Jiang’s lab and Hui Zheng from Qiu-Xing Jiang’s lab for the generous gift of the NaK2K F92A and KvAP channels, respectively. The authors would also like to thank Harpreet Singh for his support in wet lab studies, Neha Bajwa, Ashkan Maccabi, Dina Darbinian and Nicholas J. Jackson for their support throughout the experiments.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, The Author(s).
PY - 2018/12/1
Y1 - 2018/12/1
N2 - The ability to reversibly and non-invasively modulate region-specific brain activity in vivo suggests Low Intensity Focused Ultrasound (LIFU) as potential therapeutics for neurological dysfunctions such as epilepsy and Parkinson’s disease. While in vivo studies provide evidence of the bioeffects of LIFU on neuronal activity, they merely hint at potential mechanisms but do not fully explain how this technology achieves these effects. One potential hypothesis is that LIFU produces local membrane depolarization by mechanically perturbing the neuronal cell membrane, or activating channels or other proteins embedded in the membrane. Proteins that sense mechanical perturbations of the membrane, such as those gated by membrane tension, are prime candidates for activating in response to LIFU and thus leading to the neurological responses that have been measured. Here we use the bacterial mechanosensitive channel MscL, which has been purified and reconstituted in liposomes, to determine how LIFU may affect the activation of this membrane-tension gated channel. Two bacterial voltage-gated channels, KvAP and NaK2K F92A channels were also studied. Surprisingly, the results suggest that ultrasound modulation and membrane perturbation does not induce channel gating, but rather induces pore formation at the membrane protein-lipid interface. However, in vesicles with high MscL mechanosensitive channel concentrations, apparent decreases in pore formation are observed, suggesting that this membrane-tension-sensitive protein may serve to increase the elasticity of the membrane, presumably because of expansion of the channel in the plane of the membrane independent of channel gating.
AB - The ability to reversibly and non-invasively modulate region-specific brain activity in vivo suggests Low Intensity Focused Ultrasound (LIFU) as potential therapeutics for neurological dysfunctions such as epilepsy and Parkinson’s disease. While in vivo studies provide evidence of the bioeffects of LIFU on neuronal activity, they merely hint at potential mechanisms but do not fully explain how this technology achieves these effects. One potential hypothesis is that LIFU produces local membrane depolarization by mechanically perturbing the neuronal cell membrane, or activating channels or other proteins embedded in the membrane. Proteins that sense mechanical perturbations of the membrane, such as those gated by membrane tension, are prime candidates for activating in response to LIFU and thus leading to the neurological responses that have been measured. Here we use the bacterial mechanosensitive channel MscL, which has been purified and reconstituted in liposomes, to determine how LIFU may affect the activation of this membrane-tension gated channel. Two bacterial voltage-gated channels, KvAP and NaK2K F92A channels were also studied. Surprisingly, the results suggest that ultrasound modulation and membrane perturbation does not induce channel gating, but rather induces pore formation at the membrane protein-lipid interface. However, in vesicles with high MscL mechanosensitive channel concentrations, apparent decreases in pore formation are observed, suggesting that this membrane-tension-sensitive protein may serve to increase the elasticity of the membrane, presumably because of expansion of the channel in the plane of the membrane independent of channel gating.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057140347&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85057140347&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41598-018-35486-1
DO - 10.1038/s41598-018-35486-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 30467339
AN - SCOPUS:85057140347
SN - 2045-2322
VL - 8
JO - Scientific reports
JF - Scientific reports
IS - 1
M1 - 17250
ER -