TY - JOUR
T1 - Effect of induction therapy on graft survival in primary pediatric heart transplantation
T2 - A propensity score analysis of the UNOS database
AU - Butts, Ryan
AU - Davis, Melanie
AU - Savage, Andrew
AU - Burnette, Ali
AU - Kavarana, Minoo
AU - Bradley, Scott
AU - Atz, Andrew
AU - Nietert, Paul J.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported in part by Health Resources and Services Administration contract 234-2005-370011C. The content is the responsibility of the authors alone and does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of Health and Human Services, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Data represented is based on OPTN data as of December 31, 2013. The work was also supported, in part, by grants from the National Institutes of Health (the National Center for Advancing Translational Science grant UL1TR001450 and the National Institute of General Medical Sciences grant U54-GM104941).
Publisher Copyright:
©Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2017/6
Y1 - 2017/6
N2 - Background. The use of induction therapy in pediatric heart transplantation has increased. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of induction therapy on graft survival. Methods. The United Network for Organ Sharing database was queried for isolated pediatric heart transplants from January 1, 1994, to December 31, 2013. Propensity scores for induction treatment were calculated by estimating probability of induction using a logistic regression model. Transplants were then matched between induction treatment groups based on the propensity score, reducing potential biases. Using only propensity scorematched transplants, the effect of induction therapy on graft survival was investigated using Cox-proportional hazards. Subgroup analyses were performed based on age, race, recipient cardiac diagnosis, HLA, and recipient panel-reactive antibody (PRA). Results. Of 4565 pediatric primary heart transplants from 1994 to 2013, 3741 had complete data for the propensity score calculation. There were 2792 transplants successfully matched (induction, n = 1396; no induction, n = 1396). There were no significant differences in transplant and pretransplant covariates between induction and no induction groups. In the Cox-proportional hazards model, the use of induction of was not associated with graft loss (hazard ratio [HR], 0.88; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.75-1.01; P = 0.07). In subgroup analyses, induction therapy may be associated with improved survival in patients with PRA greater than 50% (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.34-0.97) and congenital heart disease (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.64-0.96). Conclusions. Induction therapy is not associated with improved graft survival in primary pediatric heart transplantation. However, in pediatric heart transplant recipients with PRA greater than 50% or congenital heart disease, induction therapy is associated with improved survival.
AB - Background. The use of induction therapy in pediatric heart transplantation has increased. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of induction therapy on graft survival. Methods. The United Network for Organ Sharing database was queried for isolated pediatric heart transplants from January 1, 1994, to December 31, 2013. Propensity scores for induction treatment were calculated by estimating probability of induction using a logistic regression model. Transplants were then matched between induction treatment groups based on the propensity score, reducing potential biases. Using only propensity scorematched transplants, the effect of induction therapy on graft survival was investigated using Cox-proportional hazards. Subgroup analyses were performed based on age, race, recipient cardiac diagnosis, HLA, and recipient panel-reactive antibody (PRA). Results. Of 4565 pediatric primary heart transplants from 1994 to 2013, 3741 had complete data for the propensity score calculation. There were 2792 transplants successfully matched (induction, n = 1396; no induction, n = 1396). There were no significant differences in transplant and pretransplant covariates between induction and no induction groups. In the Cox-proportional hazards model, the use of induction of was not associated with graft loss (hazard ratio [HR], 0.88; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.75-1.01; P = 0.07). In subgroup analyses, induction therapy may be associated with improved survival in patients with PRA greater than 50% (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.34-0.97) and congenital heart disease (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.64-0.96). Conclusions. Induction therapy is not associated with improved graft survival in primary pediatric heart transplantation. However, in pediatric heart transplant recipients with PRA greater than 50% or congenital heart disease, induction therapy is associated with improved survival.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84976537433&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84976537433&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/TP.0000000000001285
DO - 10.1097/TP.0000000000001285
M3 - Article
C2 - 27362312
AN - SCOPUS:84976537433
SN - 0041-1337
VL - 101
SP - 1228
EP - 1233
JO - Transplantation
JF - Transplantation
IS - 6
ER -