Early CPAP versus surfactant in extremely preterm infants

Neil N. Finer, Waldemar A. Carlo, Michele C. Walsh, Wade Rich, Marie G. Gantz, Abbot R. Laptook, Bradley A. Yoder, Roger G. Faix, Abhik Das, W. Kenneth Poole, Edward F. Donovan, Nancy S. Newman, Namasivayam Ambalavanan, Ivan D. Frantz, Susie Buchter, Pablo J. Sánchez, Kathleen A. Kennedy, Nirupama Laroia, Brenda B. Poindexter, C. Michael CottenKrisa P. Van Meurs, Shahnaz Duara, Vivek Narendran, Beena G. Sood, T. Michael O'Shea, Edward F. Bell, Vineet Bhandari, Kristi L. Watterberg, Rosemary D. Higgins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

846 Scopus citations


BACKGROUND: There are limited data to inform the choice between early treatment with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and early surfactant treatment as the initial support for extremely-low-birth-weight infants. METHODS: We performed a randomized, multicenter trial, with a 2-by-2 factorial design, involving infants who were born between 24 weeks 0 days and 27 weeks 6 days of gestation. Infants were randomly assigned to intubation and surfactant treatment (within 1 hour after birth) or to CPAP treatment initiated in the delivery room, with subsequent use of a protocol-driven limited ventilation strategy. Infants were also randomly assigned to one of two target ranges of oxygen saturation. The primary outcome was death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia as defined by the requirement for supplemental oxygen at 36 weeks (with an attempt at withdrawal of supplemental oxygen in neonates who were receiving less than 30% oxygen). RESULTS: A total of 1316 infants were enrolled in the study. The rates of the primary outcome did not differ significantly between the CPAP group and the surfactant group (47.8% and 51.0%, respectively; relative risk with CPAP, 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85 to 1.05) after adjustment for gestational age, center, and familial clustering. The results were similar when bronchopulmonary dysplasia was defined according to the need for any supplemental oxygen at 36 weeks (rates of primary outcome, 48.7% and 54.1%, respectively; relative risk with CPAP, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.01). Infants who received CPAP treatment, as compared with infants who received surfactant treatment, less frequently required intubation or postnatal corticosteroids for bronchopulmonary dysplasia (P<0.001), required fewer days of mechanical ventilation (P=0.03), and were more likely to be alive and free from the need for mechanical ventilation by day 7 (P=0.01). The rates of other adverse neonatal outcomes did not differ significantly between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study support consideration of CPAP as an alternative to intubation and surfactant in preterm infants. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00233324.)

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1970-1979
Number of pages10
JournalNew England Journal of Medicine
Issue number21
StatePublished - May 27 2010

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)


Dive into the research topics of 'Early CPAP versus surfactant in extremely preterm infants'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this