TY - JOUR
T1 - Dual antiplatelets in IV thrombolysis
T2 - How much is too much?
AU - Lioutas, Vasileios Arsenios
AU - Salter, Amber
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© American Academy of Neurology.
PY - 2020/2/18
Y1 - 2020/2/18
N2 - Even after >20 years of experience, IV thrombolysis (IVT) for acute ischemic stroke apparently continues to elicit concern, largely due to fear of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH). While many of the major predisposing factors are well established,1 gray zones of uncertainty remain, including concurrent exposure to antiplatelet therapy. Although not a formal contraindication to thrombolysis per se, many perceive it as increasing the risk of sICH. Prior exposure to a single antiplatelet agent is common, due to either overlap of stroke with other vascular comorbid conditions with antiplatelet therapy indications or over-the-counter use for presumed primary prevention benefits, despite evidence to the contrary.2 The greater antiplatelet effects of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) might make it even riskier. Despite higher rates of sICH with single antiplatelet exposure in the context of IVT,3-5 this does not translate into higher mortality or worse functional status. In fact, a large observational registry-based study in the United States showed more favorable functional outcomes in those pretreated with antiplatelets.3 The available and controversial data pertaining to prestroke DAPT exposure have not clarified the risks after IVT, with some studies showing elevated sICH risk while others not.
AB - Even after >20 years of experience, IV thrombolysis (IVT) for acute ischemic stroke apparently continues to elicit concern, largely due to fear of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH). While many of the major predisposing factors are well established,1 gray zones of uncertainty remain, including concurrent exposure to antiplatelet therapy. Although not a formal contraindication to thrombolysis per se, many perceive it as increasing the risk of sICH. Prior exposure to a single antiplatelet agent is common, due to either overlap of stroke with other vascular comorbid conditions with antiplatelet therapy indications or over-the-counter use for presumed primary prevention benefits, despite evidence to the contrary.2 The greater antiplatelet effects of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) might make it even riskier. Despite higher rates of sICH with single antiplatelet exposure in the context of IVT,3-5 this does not translate into higher mortality or worse functional status. In fact, a large observational registry-based study in the United States showed more favorable functional outcomes in those pretreated with antiplatelets.3 The available and controversial data pertaining to prestroke DAPT exposure have not clarified the risks after IVT, with some studies showing elevated sICH risk while others not.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85161548709&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85161548709&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1212/WNL.0000000000008955
DO - 10.1212/WNL.0000000000008955
M3 - Review article
C2 - 31959712
AN - SCOPUS:85161548709
SN - 0028-3878
VL - 94
SP - 289
EP - 290
JO - Neurology
JF - Neurology
IS - 7
ER -