TY - JOUR
T1 - Dosimetry in Clinical Radiopharmaceutical Therapy of Cancer
T2 - Practicality Versus Perfection in Current Practice
AU - Pandit-Taskar, Neeta
AU - Iravani, Amir
AU - Lee, Dan
AU - Jacene, Heather
AU - Pryma, Dan
AU - Hope, Thomas
AU - Saboury, Babak
AU - Capala, Jacek
AU - Wahl, Richard L.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
COPYRIGHT © 2021 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
PY - 2021/12/1
Y1 - 2021/12/1
N2 - The use of radiopharmaceutical therapies (RPTs) in the treatment of cancers is growing rapidly, with more agents becoming available for clinical use in last few years and many new RPTs being in development. Dosimetry assessment is critical for personalized RPT, insofar as administered activity should be assessed and optimized in order to maximize tumor-absorbed dose while keeping normal organs within defined safe dosages. However, many current clinical RPTs do not require patient-specific dosimetry based on current Food and Drug Administration–labeled approvals, and overall, dosimetry for RPT in clinical practice and trials is highly varied and underutilized. Several factors impede rigorous use of dosimetry, as compared with the more convenient and less resource-intensive practice of empiric dosing. We review various approaches to applying dosimetry for the assessment of activity in RPT and key clinical trials, the extent of dosimetry use, the relative pros and cons of dosimetry-based versus fixed activity, and practical limiting factors pertaining to current clinical practice.
AB - The use of radiopharmaceutical therapies (RPTs) in the treatment of cancers is growing rapidly, with more agents becoming available for clinical use in last few years and many new RPTs being in development. Dosimetry assessment is critical for personalized RPT, insofar as administered activity should be assessed and optimized in order to maximize tumor-absorbed dose while keeping normal organs within defined safe dosages. However, many current clinical RPTs do not require patient-specific dosimetry based on current Food and Drug Administration–labeled approvals, and overall, dosimetry for RPT in clinical practice and trials is highly varied and underutilized. Several factors impede rigorous use of dosimetry, as compared with the more convenient and less resource-intensive practice of empiric dosing. We review various approaches to applying dosimetry for the assessment of activity in RPT and key clinical trials, the extent of dosimetry use, the relative pros and cons of dosimetry-based versus fixed activity, and practical limiting factors pertaining to current clinical practice.
KW - RPT
KW - dosimetry
KW - radionuclide
KW - radiopharmaceutical therapy
KW - theranostics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85123143556&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85123143556&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2967/jnumed.121.262977
DO - 10.2967/jnumed.121.262977
M3 - Article
C2 - 34857623
AN - SCOPUS:85123143556
SN - 0161-5505
VL - 62
SP - 60S-72S
JO - Journal of Nuclear Medicine
JF - Journal of Nuclear Medicine
ER -