Discordant Perceptions of Prognosis and Treatment Options Between Physicians and Patients With Advanced Heart Failure

Amrut V. Ambardekar, Jennifer T. Thibodeau, Adam D. DeVore, Michelle M. Kittleson, Rhondalyn C. Forde-McLean, Maryse Palardy, Maria M. Mountis, Linda Cadaret, Jeffrey J. Teuteberg, Salpy V. Pamboukian, Rongbing Xie, Lynne W. Stevenson, Garrick C. Stewart

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

37 Scopus citations


Objectives This study assessed patient and physician perceptions of heart failure (HF) disease severity and treatment options. Background The prognosis for ambulatory patients with advanced HF on medical therapy is uncertain, yet has important implications for decision making regarding transplantation and left ventricular assist device (LVAD) placement. Methods Ambulatory patients with advanced HF (New York Heart Association functional class III to IV, Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support profiles 4 to 7) on optimized medical therapy were enrolled across 11 centers. At baseline, treating cardiologists rated patients for perceived risk for transplant, LVAD, or death in the upcoming year. Patients were also surveyed about their own perceptions of life expectancy and willingness to undergo various interventions. Results At enrollment, physicians regarded 111 of 161 patients (69%) of the total cohort to be at high risk for transplant, LVAD, or death, whereas only 23 patients (14%) felt they were at high risk. After a mean follow-up of 13 months, 61 patients (38%) experienced an endpoint of 33 deaths (21%), 13 transplants (8%), and 15 LVAD implants (9%). There was poor discrimination between risk prediction among both patients and physicians. Among physician-identified high-risk patients, 77% described willingness to consider LVAD, but 63% indicated that they would decline 1 or more other simpler forms of life-sustaining therapy such as ventilation, dialysis, or a feeding tube. Conclusions Among patients with advanced HF, physicians identified most to be at high risk for transplantation, LVAD, or death, whereas few patients recognized themselves to be at high risk. Patients expressed inconsistent attitudes toward lifesaving treatments, possibly indicating poor understanding of these therapies. Educational interventions regarding disease severity and treatment options should be introduced prior to the need for advanced therapies such as intravenous inotropic therapy, transplantation, or LVAD.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)663-671
Number of pages9
JournalJACC: Heart Failure
Issue number9
StatePublished - Sep 2017


  • advanced heart failure
  • cardiac transplantation
  • mechanical circulatory support
  • patient decision making
  • ventricular assist device

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine


Dive into the research topics of 'Discordant Perceptions of Prognosis and Treatment Options Between Physicians and Patients With Advanced Heart Failure'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this