Direct evidence that perhexiline modifies myocardial substrate utilization from fatty acids to lactate

F. M H Jeffrey, L. Alvarez, V. Diczku, A. D. Sherry, C. R. Malloy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

69 Scopus citations

Abstract

Perhexiline maleate, originally classified as a calcium antagonist, is in use as an antianginal agent. The mechanism of its protective effect is unknown, but there is speculation that it involves a modification of myocardial substrate utilization, in which glycolytic sources are used rather than fatty acids. This hypothesis was tested by employing [13C]N MR isotopomer analysis to measure substrate selection in the working rat heart. Substrate utilization was measured from a mixture of substrates present at their physiological concentration, as follows: acetoacetate, glucose, lactate and long-chain fatty acids. Control perfusions were compared with those perfused with perhexiline. It was found that perhexiline increased lactate utilization, which reduced the extent of fatty acid and endogenous substrate oxidation. There was also a significant increase in cardiac output for a small and insignificant increase in oxygen consumption, which suggested an improvement in myocardial efficiency. Thus, it was confirmed by direct measurement that this drug does modify substrate oxidation, which suggests that further investigations of the role that this agent can play in the management of ischemie heart disease would be beneficial.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)469-472
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology
Volume25
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1995

Keywords

  • Myocardial substrate selection
  • Perhexiline
  • Working rat heart
  • [C]NMR isotopomer analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pharmacology
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Direct evidence that perhexiline modifies myocardial substrate utilization from fatty acids to lactate'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this