TY - JOUR
T1 - Diagnostic significance of interslice gap and imaging volume in body MR imaging
AU - Schwaighofer, B. W.
AU - Yu, K. K.
AU - Mattrey, R. F.
PY - 1989/1/1
Y1 - 1989/1/1
N2 - Thin interslice gaps and large imaging volumes are detrimental to MR signal and contrast, especially when the body coil is used. To show the influence of these two factors on fat and water signal and contrast, we performed a series of in vitro experiments. A cylinder filled with water and another filled with oil were imaged transaxially (TR = 2000 msec; TE = 20 and 70 msec) with different interslice gaps (0-150% slice thickness). A series of images was obtained to cover a 40-cm imaging volume. Increasing interslice gap thickness increased water signal without affecting fat signal, resulting in a decrease in fat/water contrast on TE = 20 msec (less T1-weighting) and increasing contrast on TE = 70 msec (more T2-weighting). Contrast nearly doubled when the interslice gap was increased from 10% to 75%. As slices moved away from the central slice, fat and water signals decreased slowly to 12.5 cm off center. Signal loss was significant with offsets greater than 12.5 cm. These results emphasize that to obtain proper contrast on T2-weighted images, the optimal interslice gap should be used and the region of interest should be near the central slice. Otherwise, images should be interpreted with caution.
AB - Thin interslice gaps and large imaging volumes are detrimental to MR signal and contrast, especially when the body coil is used. To show the influence of these two factors on fat and water signal and contrast, we performed a series of in vitro experiments. A cylinder filled with water and another filled with oil were imaged transaxially (TR = 2000 msec; TE = 20 and 70 msec) with different interslice gaps (0-150% slice thickness). A series of images was obtained to cover a 40-cm imaging volume. Increasing interslice gap thickness increased water signal without affecting fat signal, resulting in a decrease in fat/water contrast on TE = 20 msec (less T1-weighting) and increasing contrast on TE = 70 msec (more T2-weighting). Contrast nearly doubled when the interslice gap was increased from 10% to 75%. As slices moved away from the central slice, fat and water signals decreased slowly to 12.5 cm off center. Signal loss was significant with offsets greater than 12.5 cm. These results emphasize that to obtain proper contrast on T2-weighted images, the optimal interslice gap should be used and the region of interest should be near the central slice. Otherwise, images should be interpreted with caution.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024353690&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024353690&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2214/ajr.153.3.629
DO - 10.2214/ajr.153.3.629
M3 - Article
C2 - 2763964
AN - SCOPUS:0024353690
SN - 0361-803X
VL - 153
SP - 629
EP - 632
JO - American Journal of Roentgenology
JF - American Journal of Roentgenology
IS - 3
ER -