Diagnostic efficacy of posterior tibialis tendon dysfunction: a systematic review of literature

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective: To perform a systematic review to examine the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonography, and radiography in the evaluation of posterior tibial tendon dysfunction (PTTD). Materials and methods: Medline, Scopus, Embase, and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched for relevant studies through April 2023. The study quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 scoring system. Results: Of the initial 634 studies, 12 studies met the quality criteria and were included, with 645 PTTs evaluated with MRI, 133 with US, and 97 with radiography. MRI was found to be more sensitive and specific than ultrasound, radiography, and clinical evaluation for detecting PTTD, with a sensitivity of up to 95%, specificity of up to 100%, and accuracy of 96% for detecting PTT tears. US showed a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 90% for diagnosing tendinopathy, and a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 80% for diagnosing peritendinosis when compared to MRI. Weight-bearing radiographs had a sensitivity of 71.4%, specificity of 88.9%, and diagnostic accuracy of 81.3% when diagnosing PTT ruptures. Various radiologic measurements were also found to have a significant relationship with PTT tears but were poorly correlated with PTT tendinosis and isolated tenosynovitis. Conclusion: Magnetic resonance imaging is the preferred imaging tool for evaluating patients with posterior tibial tendon dysfunction, with higher diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity compared to ultrasound and radiographic imaging. However, initial imaging with ultrasound and radiographs may be used due to their availability and cost-effectiveness. Clinical relevance: PTTD affects 3% of women ≥ 40 years and 10% of adults ≥ 65 years globally. Using the appropriate imaging study, MRI ensures that patients suffering from PTTD are diagnosed and treated in a timely manner. Key Points: • This review aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of MRI, ultrasonography, and radiography in evaluating PTTD. • MRI outperformed ultrasound and radiography, with higher sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in detecting PTT tears. • MRI is the preferred imaging modality for the initial diagnosis of PTTD.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalEuropean Radiology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2023

Keywords

  • Magnetic resonance imaging
  • Pes planus
  • Posterior tibial tendon dysfunction
  • Radiography
  • Ultrasonography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Diagnostic efficacy of posterior tibialis tendon dysfunction: a systematic review of literature'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this