@article{76c0b60318034412900471616496341f,
title = "Cuffed versus uncuffed endotracheal tubes for neonates",
abstract = "Objectives: This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows:. To assess the benefits and harms of cuffed endotracheal tubes (ETT) (inflated or non-inflated) compared to uncuffed endotracheal tubes for respiratory support in neonates. We will compare the following comparisons. Cuffed ETT (inflated or not) versus uncuffed ETT: cuffed not inflated versus uncuffed; cuffed inflated versus uncuffed. Cuffed inflated versus cuffed not inflated.",
author = "Vedanta Dariya and Luca Moresco and Matteo Bruschettini and Brion, {Luc P.}",
note = "Funding Information: The methods section of this protocol is based on a standard template used by Cochrane Neonatal. We thank Matthias Bank (Library and ICT services, Lund University) for defining the search strategy. We would like to thank Cochrane Neonatal: Colleen Ovelman, Managing Editor, Jane Cracknell, Assistant Managing Editor, Roger Soll, Co-coordinating editor, who provided editorial and administrative support. As a Cochrane Neonatal Associate Editors, Dr Georg M Schm?lzer and Dr Vibuhuti Shah peer reviewed and offered feedback for this protocol. Publisher Copyright: Copyright {\textcopyright} 2020 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.",
year = "2020",
month = sep,
day = "23",
doi = "10.1002/14651858.CD013736",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2020",
journal = "Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews",
issn = "1361-6137",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "9",
}