TY - JOUR
T1 - Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance urography at 3T
T2 - Clinical feasibility
AU - Childs, David D.
AU - Leyendecker, John R.
AU - Gianini, John
AU - Hall, Craig
PY - 2013/1/1
Y1 - 2013/1/1
N2 - OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of performing diagnostic-quality contrast-enhanced excretory magnetic resonance urography (eMRU) at 3T, examining both image quality and diagnostic accuracy for a range of urinary tract abnormalities. METHODS: The diuretic-enhanced 3T eMRUs of 37 patients were reviewed to assess for the diagnostic conspicuity of urinary tract abnormalities, extent of urinary tract visualization on excretory images, and presence and severity of image artifacts. RESULTS: Excretory images allowed greater than 75% visualization in 90.8% of renal collecting systems, 90.8% of ureters, and 82.3% of bladders. Common artifacts included susceptibility (21.3%), contrast mixing (21.3%), patient motion (20.4%), signal inhomogeneity (19.4%), and peristaltic motion (17.6%). Severe artifacts occurred in 21.6% of studies. Five of 8 urothelial neoplasms were detected, with 1 false-positive lesion in the bladder. Urolithiasis was correctly diagnosed in 7 of 9 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Although image artifacts can hamper eMRU at 3T, initial results are promising for evaluation of the urothelium.
AB - OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of performing diagnostic-quality contrast-enhanced excretory magnetic resonance urography (eMRU) at 3T, examining both image quality and diagnostic accuracy for a range of urinary tract abnormalities. METHODS: The diuretic-enhanced 3T eMRUs of 37 patients were reviewed to assess for the diagnostic conspicuity of urinary tract abnormalities, extent of urinary tract visualization on excretory images, and presence and severity of image artifacts. RESULTS: Excretory images allowed greater than 75% visualization in 90.8% of renal collecting systems, 90.8% of ureters, and 82.3% of bladders. Common artifacts included susceptibility (21.3%), contrast mixing (21.3%), patient motion (20.4%), signal inhomogeneity (19.4%), and peristaltic motion (17.6%). Severe artifacts occurred in 21.6% of studies. Five of 8 urothelial neoplasms were detected, with 1 false-positive lesion in the bladder. Urolithiasis was correctly diagnosed in 7 of 9 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Although image artifacts can hamper eMRU at 3T, initial results are promising for evaluation of the urothelium.
KW - 3T
KW - MRI
KW - urography
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84872896916&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84872896916&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3182711fd9
DO - 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3182711fd9
M3 - Article
C2 - 23321830
AN - SCOPUS:84872896916
SN - 0363-8715
VL - 37
SP - 29
EP - 36
JO - Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography
JF - Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography
IS - 1
ER -