Considerations for instituting pediatric pulmonary embolism response teams: A tool kit

Madhvi Rajpurkar, Rachel P. Rosovsky, Suzan Williams, Anthony K.C. Chan, C. Heleen van Ommen, E. Vincent S. Faustino, Melissa White, Mihir Parikh, Nongnuch Sirachainan, Tina Biss, Neil A. Goldenberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The incidence of pediatric pulmonary embolism (PE) has increased by 200 % in the last decade, but at a single center, it is still infrequent. Given the unique epidemiologic features of pediatric PE, diagnosis is often delayed, and the management is empiric, based on individual physician experience or preference. Thus, there is a strong need for center-specific uniform management of pediatric PE patients. In adults, the development of pulmonary embolism response teams (PERTs) or PE critical care pathways has shortened the time to diagnosis and the initiation of definitive management. Evidence to support an improvement in PE outcomes after the development of PERTs does not exist in children. Nonetheless, we have summarized the practical practice guidelines that physicians and institutions can adopt to establish their institutional PERTs or critical pathways. We also provide strategies for resource-challenged institutions for partnering with centers with expertise in the management of pediatric PE.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)97-107
Number of pages11
JournalThrombosis research
Volume236
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2024

Keywords

  • Critical pathways
  • Pediatrics
  • Pulmonary embolism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hematology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Considerations for instituting pediatric pulmonary embolism response teams: A tool kit'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this