Conservative versus aggressive transfusion regimens in sickle cell disease

G. R. Buchanan, Z. R. Rogers, S. Apfelroth, E. Vichinsky, L. Neumayr, D. Black

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterpeer-review

8 Scopus citations


To the Editor: Vichinsky and coworkers are to be applauded for their article (July 27 issue)1 reporting that patients with sickle cell disease undergoing general anesthesia and surgery fare just as well with a less intensive transfusion regimen as with a more aggressive approach. However, the authors' study did not include a “no transfusion” arm. Thus, whether some or even most patients with sickle cell disease might not require blood transfusions at all before elective surgery remains uncertain. This point is relevant not only because of the high incidence of alloimmunization and the occurrence of other transfusion-related complications in their.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1641-1642
Number of pages2
JournalNew England Journal of Medicine
Issue number24
StatePublished - Dec 14 1995

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine


Dive into the research topics of 'Conservative versus aggressive transfusion regimens in sickle cell disease'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this