Competing values: A respectful critique of narrative research

Michael C. Gottlieb; Jon Lasser

doi:10.1207/S15327019EB1102_6

Competing values: A respectful critique of narrative research

Michael C. Gottlieb, Jon Lasser

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Smythe and Murray (2000) presented the basic ethical issues in narrative research (NR) in a comprehensive, well-reasoned, and direct manner. In this critique, we highlight 3 issues. Two matters appear to challenge the internal inconsistency of the assumptions of NR: privileging some voices over others and a potential inherent conflict of interest for some researchers. We also examine some issues regarding the protection of research participants and conclude with modest recommendations.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	191-194
Number of pages	4
Journal	Ethics and Behavior
Volume	11
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327019EB1102_6
State	Published - 2001

Keywords

Ethics
Narrative research
Postmodern
Research ethics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Social Psychology
Psychology(all)

Access to Document

10.1207/S15327019EB1102_6

Cite this

@article{12d39e57061d47a198259900754ed24a,

title = "Competing values: A respectful critique of narrative research",

abstract = "Smythe and Murray (2000) presented the basic ethical issues in narrative research (NR) in a comprehensive, well-reasoned, and direct manner. In this critique, we highlight 3 issues. Two matters appear to challenge the internal inconsistency of the assumptions of NR: privileging some voices over others and a potential inherent conflict of interest for some researchers. We also examine some issues regarding the protection of research participants and conclude with modest recommendations.",

keywords = "Ethics, Narrative research, Postmodern, Research ethics",

author = "Gottlieb, {Michael C.} and Jon Lasser",

year = "2001",

doi = "10.1207/S15327019EB1102_6",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "11",

pages = "191--194",

journal = "Ethics and Behavior",

issn = "1050-8422",

publisher = "Routledge",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Competing values

T2 - A respectful critique of narrative research

AU - Gottlieb, Michael C.

AU - Lasser, Jon

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Smythe and Murray (2000) presented the basic ethical issues in narrative research (NR) in a comprehensive, well-reasoned, and direct manner. In this critique, we highlight 3 issues. Two matters appear to challenge the internal inconsistency of the assumptions of NR: privileging some voices over others and a potential inherent conflict of interest for some researchers. We also examine some issues regarding the protection of research participants and conclude with modest recommendations.

AB - Smythe and Murray (2000) presented the basic ethical issues in narrative research (NR) in a comprehensive, well-reasoned, and direct manner. In this critique, we highlight 3 issues. Two matters appear to challenge the internal inconsistency of the assumptions of NR: privileging some voices over others and a potential inherent conflict of interest for some researchers. We also examine some issues regarding the protection of research participants and conclude with modest recommendations.

KW - Ethics

KW - Narrative research

KW - Postmodern

KW - Research ethics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035634988&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035634988&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1207/S15327019EB1102_6

DO - 10.1207/S15327019EB1102_6

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0035634988

SN - 1050-8422

VL - 11

SP - 191

EP - 194

JO - Ethics and Behavior

JF - Ethics and Behavior

IS - 2

ER -

Competing values: A respectful critique of narrative research

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this