Clinicopathologic features and outcomes of patients with lung adenocarcinomas harboring BRAF mutations in the Lung Cancer Mutation Consortium

Liza C. Villaruz, Mark A. Socinski, Shira Abberbock, Lynne D. Berry, Bruce E. Johnson, David J. Kwiatkowski, A. John Iafrate, Marileila Varella-Garcia, Wilbur A. Franklin, D. Ross Camidge, Lecia V. Sequist, Eric B. Haura, Mark Ladanyi, Brenda F. Kurland, Kelly Kugler, John D. Minna, Paul A. Bunn, Mark G. Kris

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

91 Scopus citations


BACKGROUND: The advent of effective targeted therapy for BRAFV600E-mutant lung adenocarcinomas necessitates further exploration of the unique clinical features and behavior of advanced-stage BRAF-mutant lung adenocarcinomas. METHODS: Data were reviewed for patients with advanced lung adenocarcinomas enrolled in the Lung Cancer Mutation Consortium whose tumors underwent testing for mutations in epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR), Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 ( HER2), AKT1, BRAF, dual-specificity mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 1 ( MEK1), neuroblastoma RAS viral (v-ras) oncogene homolog (NRAS), and phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit a (PIK3CA); for anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) translocations; and for MET amplification. RESULTS: Twenty-one BRAF mutations were identified in 951 patients with adenocarcinomas (2.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4%-3.4%): 17 (81%; 95% CI, 60%-92%) were BRAFV600E mutations, and 4 were non-BRAFV600E mutations. Among the 733 cases tested for all 10 genes, BRAF mutations were more likely to occur than most other genotypic abnormalities in current or former smokers (BRAF vs sensitizing EGFR, 82% vs 36%, mid-P < .001; BRAF vs ALK, 39%, mid-P = .003; BRAF vs other mutations, 49%, mid-P = .02; BRAF vs patients with more than 1 oncogenic driver [doubleton], 46%, mid-P = .04.) The double-mutation rate was 16% among patients with BRAF mutations but 5% among patients with other genomic abnormalities (mid-P = .045). Differences were not found in survival between patients with BRAF mutations and those with other genomic abnormalities (P > .20). CONCLUSIONS: BRAF mutations occurred in 2.2% of advanced-stage lung adenocarcinomas, were most commonly V600E, and were associated with distinct clinicopathologic features in comparison with other genomic subtypes and with a high mutation rate in more than 1 gene. These findings underscore the importance of comprehensive genomic profiling in assessing patients with advanced lung adenocarcinomas.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)448-456
Number of pages9
Issue number3
StatePublished - Feb 1 2015


  • BRAF
  • Clinicopathologic features
  • Genomic profiling
  • Lung Cancer Mutation Consortium
  • Lung adenocarcinomas

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research


Dive into the research topics of 'Clinicopathologic features and outcomes of patients with lung adenocarcinomas harboring BRAF mutations in the Lung Cancer Mutation Consortium'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this