CASE AND COMMENTARY: PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE Should Antipsychotics’ Risks Be Accepted by Clinicians on Behalf of Patients to Achieve Benefits of Mitigating Older Adults’ Behavioral Symptoms in Short-Staffed Units?

Alex Rollo, Jeena Kar, Uma Suryadevara, Mary Camp

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

This commentary on a case considers risks and benefits of pharmacological and nonpharmacological management of agitation in patients with dementia. Specifically, it considers beneficence and nonmaleficence in treatment decisions that affect both patients and staff as well as autonomy and surrogate decision making.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)E725-E732
JournalAMA journal of ethics
Volume25
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2023

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects
  • Health(social science)
  • Health Policy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'CASE AND COMMENTARY: PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLE Should Antipsychotics’ Risks Be Accepted by Clinicians on Behalf of Patients to Achieve Benefits of Mitigating Older Adults’ Behavioral Symptoms in Short-Staffed Units?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this