TY - JOUR
T1 - Carbon-11 and Carbon-12 beam range verifications through prompt gamma and annihilation gamma measurements
T2 - Monte carlo simulations
AU - Chalise, Ananta Raj
AU - Chi, Yujie
AU - Lai, Youfang
AU - Shao, Yiping
AU - Jin, Mingwu
N1 - Funding Information:
We are grateful to Dr William (Joe) Allen from Texas Accelerated Computational Center (TACC) for computational resource and technical support. We highly appreciate Dr Deepak Shrestha from UT Southwestern, for discussions during the initial phase of this study. We are also thankful to Dr George Dedes from LMU Munich for his input regarding beam time structure. This work was supported in part by the UT Southwestern Medical Center under a Particle Therapy Seed Grant and by the US National Institutes of Health under Grant No. NIH/NCI R15CA199020-01A1, NIH/NCI R01CA218402, and NIH/NIBIB R01EB019438. We thank Dr Jonathan Feinberg at UT Southwestern for editing the manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 IOP Publishing Ltd
PY - 2020/11
Y1 - 2020/11
N2 - Range uncertainty remains a big concern in particle therapy, as it may cause target dose degradation and normal tissue overdosing. Positron emission tomography (PET) and prompt gamma imaging (PGI) are two promising modalities for range verification. However, the relatively long acquisition time of PET and the relatively low yield of PGI pose challenges for real-time range verification. In this paper, we explore using the primary Carbon-11 (C-11) ion beams to enhance the gamma yield compared to the primary C-12 ion beams to improve PET and PGI by using Monte Carlo simulations of water and PMMA phantoms at four incident energies (95, 200, 300, and 430 MeV u−1). Prompt gammas (PGs) and annihilation gammas (AGs) were recorded for post-processing to mimic PGI and PET imaging, respectively. We used both time-of-flight (TOF) and energy selections for PGI, which boosted the ratio of PGs to background neutrons to 2.44, up from 0.87 without the selections. At the lowest incident energy (100 MeVu-1), PG yield from C-11 was 0.82 times of that from C-12, while AG yield from C-11 was 6 ∼ 11 folds higher than from C-12 in PMMA. At higher energies, PG differences between C-11 and C-12 were much smaller, while AG yield from C-11 was 30%∼90% higher than from C-12 using minute-acquisition. With minute-acquisition, the AG depth distribution of C-11 showed a sharp peak coincident with the Bragg peak due to the decay of the primary C-11 ions, but that of C-12 had no such one. The high AG yield and distinct peaks could lead to more precise range verification of C-11 than C-12. These results demonstrate that using C-11 ion beams for potentially combined PGI and PET has great potential to improve online single-spot range verification accuracy and precision.
AB - Range uncertainty remains a big concern in particle therapy, as it may cause target dose degradation and normal tissue overdosing. Positron emission tomography (PET) and prompt gamma imaging (PGI) are two promising modalities for range verification. However, the relatively long acquisition time of PET and the relatively low yield of PGI pose challenges for real-time range verification. In this paper, we explore using the primary Carbon-11 (C-11) ion beams to enhance the gamma yield compared to the primary C-12 ion beams to improve PET and PGI by using Monte Carlo simulations of water and PMMA phantoms at four incident energies (95, 200, 300, and 430 MeV u−1). Prompt gammas (PGs) and annihilation gammas (AGs) were recorded for post-processing to mimic PGI and PET imaging, respectively. We used both time-of-flight (TOF) and energy selections for PGI, which boosted the ratio of PGs to background neutrons to 2.44, up from 0.87 without the selections. At the lowest incident energy (100 MeVu-1), PG yield from C-11 was 0.82 times of that from C-12, while AG yield from C-11 was 6 ∼ 11 folds higher than from C-12 in PMMA. At higher energies, PG differences between C-11 and C-12 were much smaller, while AG yield from C-11 was 30%∼90% higher than from C-12 using minute-acquisition. With minute-acquisition, the AG depth distribution of C-11 showed a sharp peak coincident with the Bragg peak due to the decay of the primary C-11 ions, but that of C-12 had no such one. The high AG yield and distinct peaks could lead to more precise range verification of C-11 than C-12. These results demonstrate that using C-11 ion beams for potentially combined PGI and PET has great potential to improve online single-spot range verification accuracy and precision.
KW - Annihilation gamma (AG)
KW - Beam range verification
KW - Carbon-11
KW - Hadron therapy
KW - Monte Carlo simulation
KW - Prompt gamma (PG)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092898782&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85092898782&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1088/2057-1976/abb8b6
DO - 10.1088/2057-1976/abb8b6
M3 - Article
C2 - 34040798
AN - SCOPUS:85092898782
SN - 2057-1976
VL - 6
JO - Biomedical Physics and Engineering Express
JF - Biomedical Physics and Engineering Express
IS - 6
M1 - A13
ER -