Bone marrow transplant conditioning intensified with liposomal clodronate to eliminate residual host antigen presenting cells fails to ameliorate GVHD and increases peri-BMT mortality

Linda A. Everse, Larry D. Anderson, Nico Van Rooijen, Craig A. Mullen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background. Graft versus host disease (GVHD) mediated by allogeneic donor T cells may be initiated and/or exacerbated by residual host antigen presenting cells (APC) which survive the transplant conditioning regimen. We examined whether the depletion of hepatic and splenic APC could reduce the severity of hepatic GVHD after bone marrow transplantation (BMT). Methods. Recipient mice were depleted for hepatic and splenic phagocytic APCs by i.v. injection of clodronate-(dichloromethylene diphosphonate) containing liposomes before fully allogeneic or MHC-matched, minor Ag-mismatched BMT. Severity of hepatic GVHD was scored on histological sections 2, 3, 4, or 9 weeks after BMT. Results. No differences in the severity of GVHD were observed between APC-depleted mice and control mice. APC-depleted mice had increased peritransplant mortality due to sepsis. Bacterial clearance assays showed that APC-depleted mice were unable to efficiently clear bacteria, although nondepleted, transplanted mice were able to clear bacteria as quickly as naïve control mice. Conclusions. Residual host phagocytic APC do not appear to play a role in the induction of GVHD after BMT. They are, however, essential for prevention of sepsis in the transplant host.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)611-618
Number of pages8
JournalTransplantation
Volume71
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 15 2001

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Transplantation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Bone marrow transplant conditioning intensified with liposomal clodronate to eliminate residual host antigen presenting cells fails to ameliorate GVHD and increases peri-BMT mortality'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this