TY - JOUR
T1 - Beyond the Wada
T2 - An updated approach to pre-surgical language and memory testing: An updated review of available evaluation techniques and recommended workflow to limit Wada test use to essential clinical cases
AU - Qadri, Syed
AU - Dave, Hina
AU - Das, Rohit
AU - Alick-Lindstrom, Sasha
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021
PY - 2021/8
Y1 - 2021/8
N2 - The Intracarotid amobarbital test (IAT), also called Wada test, is considered the “gold standard” for lateralizing language dominance in the pre-surgical evaluation of patients with epilepsy. In addition, it has been further modified to assess the postoperative risk of amnesia in patients undergoing temporal lobectomy. Since then it has been utilized to lateralize language and assess pre-surgical memory function. Over the years, its popularity has declined due to several limitations and availability of alternative procedures like fMRI and MEG. A survey of its use in the pre-surgical evaluation for epilepsy surgery has not been performed since the 2008 international survey by Baxendale et al. and it was heavily skewed due to data from European and North American countries. Only approximately 12% of the epilepsy centers indicated that they used the Wada test in every patient to assess preoperative memory function and language lateralization before temporal lobectomy. Nowadays, we have many functional mapping tools at our disposal. It has become somewhat unsuitable to have epilepsy patients undergo an invasive test such as the Wada test for the risks associated with it outweigh the benefits. Our objective is to review the Wada Test and alternative methods of assessing language and memory dominance, as it is past its prime and should only be used in specific circumstances.
AB - The Intracarotid amobarbital test (IAT), also called Wada test, is considered the “gold standard” for lateralizing language dominance in the pre-surgical evaluation of patients with epilepsy. In addition, it has been further modified to assess the postoperative risk of amnesia in patients undergoing temporal lobectomy. Since then it has been utilized to lateralize language and assess pre-surgical memory function. Over the years, its popularity has declined due to several limitations and availability of alternative procedures like fMRI and MEG. A survey of its use in the pre-surgical evaluation for epilepsy surgery has not been performed since the 2008 international survey by Baxendale et al. and it was heavily skewed due to data from European and North American countries. Only approximately 12% of the epilepsy centers indicated that they used the Wada test in every patient to assess preoperative memory function and language lateralization before temporal lobectomy. Nowadays, we have many functional mapping tools at our disposal. It has become somewhat unsuitable to have epilepsy patients undergo an invasive test such as the Wada test for the risks associated with it outweigh the benefits. Our objective is to review the Wada Test and alternative methods of assessing language and memory dominance, as it is past its prime and should only be used in specific circumstances.
KW - Epilepsy pre-surgical workup
KW - Epilepsy surgery
KW - Intracarotid amobarbital test
KW - Intractable focal epilepsy
KW - Language and memory testing
KW - MEG
KW - Mesial temporal lobe epilepsy
KW - Neuropsychology testing
KW - Wada
KW - fMRI
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85107112528&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85107112528&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2021.106673
DO - 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2021.106673
M3 - Review article
C2 - 34082393
AN - SCOPUS:85107112528
SN - 0920-1211
VL - 174
JO - Epilepsy Research
JF - Epilepsy Research
M1 - 106673
ER -