Battlefield urologic injuries: The Gulf War experience

Ian M. Thompson, Stephen F. Flaherty, Allen F. Morey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

24 Scopus citations


Background: We sought to ascertain the incidence and type of urologic injuries requiring operations during the Gulf War. Study Design: Of the 31 United States urologic surgeons deployed to the Persian Gulf theater of operations, 11 responded to a survey concerning the type and frequency of urologic trauma surgical procedures. Results: The 11 urologic surgeons performed a total of 55 surgical procedures, 30 of which were for urologic injuries. Most injuries were due to fragmentation devices. Only 17% involved the kidney and none involved the ureter; 83% involved the pelvic organs and external genitalia. The majority of surgical procedures performed for these injuries were conservative (organ sparing). Anecdotal observations by the surgeons suggested that the use of the flak vest may have led to a shift away from abdominal injuries to injuries of the pelvis and genitalia. Conclusions: Urologic injuries in the Gulf War primarily involved the pelvis and genitalia and were frequently managed conservatively. The prevalence of fragmentation injuries and use of the flak vest may explain this observation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)139-141
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of the American College of Surgeons
Issue number2
StatePublished - 1998

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery


Dive into the research topics of 'Battlefield urologic injuries: The Gulf War experience'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this