Atrioesophageal Fistula Rates Before and After Adoption of Active Esophageal Cooling During Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

Javier Sanchez, Christopher Woods, Jason Zagrodzky, Jose Nazari, Matthew J. Singleton, Amir Schricker, Annie Ruppert, Babette Brumback, Benjamin Jenny, Charles Athill, Christopher Joseph, Dipak Shah, Gaurav Upadhyay, Erik Kulstad, John Cogan, Jordan Leyton-Mange, Julie Cooper, Kamala Tamirisa, Samuel Omotoye, Saroj TimilsinaAlejandro Perez-Verdia, Andrew Kaplan, Apoor Patel, Alex Ro, Andrew Corsello, Arun Kolli, Brian Greet, Danya Willms, David Burkland, Demetrio Castillo, Firas Zahwe, Hemal Nayak, James Daniels, John MacGregor, Matthew Sackett, W. Michael Kutayli, Michel Barakat, Robert Percell, Spyridon Akrivakis, Steven C. Hao, Taylor Liu, Ambrose Panico, Archana Ramireddy, Thomas Dewland, Edward P. Gerstenfeld, Daniel Benhayon Lanes, Edward Sze, Gregory Francisco, Jose Silva, Julia McHugh, Kai Sung, Leon Feldman, Nicholas Serafini, Raymond Kawasaki, Richard Hongo, Richard Kuk, Robert Hayward, Shirley Park, Andrew Vu, Christopher Henry, Shane Bailey, Steven Mickelsen, Taresh Taneja, Westby Fisher, Mark Metzl

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Active esophageal cooling reduces the incidence of endoscopically identified severe esophageal lesions during radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation of the left atrium for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. A formal analysis of the atrioesophageal fistula (AEF) rate with active esophageal cooling has not previously been performed. Objectives: The authors aimed to compare AEF rates before and after the adoption of active esophageal cooling. Methods: This institutional review board (IRB)-approved study was a prospective analysis of retrospective data, designed before collecting and analyzing the real-world data. The number of AEFs occurring in equivalent time frames before and after adoption of cooling using a dedicated esophageal cooling device (ensoETM, Attune Medical) were quantified across 25 prespecified hospital systems. AEF rates were then compared using generalized estimating equations robust to cluster correlation. Results: A total of 14,224 patients received active esophageal cooling during RF ablation across the 25 hospital systems, which included a total of 30 separate hospitals. In the time frames before adoption of active cooling, a total of 10,962 patients received primarily luminal esophageal temperature (LET) monitoring during their RF ablations. In the preadoption cohort, a total of 16 AEFs occurred, for an AEF rate of 0.146%, in line with other published estimates for procedures using LET monitoring. In the postadoption cohort, no AEFs were found in the prespecified sites, yielding an AEF rate of 0% (P < 0.0001). Conclusions: Adoption of active esophageal cooling during RF ablation of the left atrium for the treatment of atrial fibrillation was associated with a significant reduction in AEF rate.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2558-2570
Number of pages13
JournalJACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
Volume9
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2023

Keywords

  • atrial fibrillation
  • atrioesophageal fistula
  • esophageal cooling
  • radiofrequency ablation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Physiology (medical)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Atrioesophageal Fistula Rates Before and After Adoption of Active Esophageal Cooling During Atrial Fibrillation Ablation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this