TY - JOUR
T1 - Association of polypill therapy with cardiovascular outcomes, mortality, and adherence
T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
AU - Rao, Shreya
AU - Jamal Siddiqi, Tariq
AU - Khan, Muhammad Shahzeb
AU - Michos, Erin D.
AU - Navar, Ann Marie
AU - Wang, Thomas J.
AU - Greene, Stephen J.
AU - Prabhakaran, Dorairaj
AU - Khera, Amit
AU - Pandey, Ambarish
N1 - Funding Information:
Dr. Rao is supported by an instiutional training grant from the National Insitutes of Health (grant T-32HL125247-06 ). Dr. Greene has received research support from the Duke University Department of Medicine Chair’s Research Award, American Heart Association, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cytokinetics, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, and Sanofi; has served on advisory boards for Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cytokinetics, Roche Diagnostics, and Sanofi; has received speaker fees from Boehringer Ingelheim; and has served as a consultant for Amgen, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Sanofi, and Vifor. Dr. Pandey received grant funding outside the present study from Applied Therapeutics; has received honoraria outside of the present study as an advisor/consultant for Tricog Health Inc. and Lilly, USA, and has received nonfinancial support from Pfizer and Merck. Dr. Pandey is supported by the Gilead Sciences Research Scholar Program, the National Institute of Aging GEMSSTAR Grant (1R03AG067960–01), and grant support from Applied Therapeutics. Other authors have no relevant disclosures.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Prior studies have reported improvements in population-level risk factor burden and cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes using polypills for CVD risk reduction. However, a comprehensive assessment of the impact of polypills on CVD outcomes, mortality, adherence, and side effects across different settings has not previously been reported. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials examining the association between polypill therapy and CVD outcomes published before February 2021. The primary outcome of interest was the risk of major adverse CVD events (MACE). Risk ratios for dichotomous outcomes were converted to log RR and pooled using a generic inverse variance weighted random-effects model. Data for continuous outcomes were pooled using random-effects modeling and presented as mean differences with 95% CIs. Eight studies representing 25,584 patients were included for analysis. In the overall pooled analysis, the use of polypills was associated with a non-significant reduction in the risk of MACE (RR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.70–1.02) and significant reductions in the risk of all-cause mortality (RR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.81–1.00). The reductions in the risk of MACE with polypill use varied by baseline risk and nature of the study population (primary prevention vs. secondary prevention), with the most significant risk reduction among lower-risk cohorts, including within primary prevention populations [RR 0.70 (0.62, 0.79)]. Among measures of CVD risk factors, modest but significant reductions were observed for systolic and diastolic blood pressure [systolic: mean difference 1.99 mmHg (95% CI: −3.07 to −0.91); diastolic: mean difference 1.30 mmHg (95% CI: −2.42 to −0.19), but not for levels of total or low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol. Use of the polypill strategy significantly improved drug adherence (RR: 1.31; 95% CI: 1.11–1.55) with no association between polypill use and rates of adverse events or drug discontinuation. The use of polypill formulations is associated with significant reductions in CVD risk factors and the risk of all-cause mortality and MACE, particularly in the low-risk and primary prevention population.
AB - Prior studies have reported improvements in population-level risk factor burden and cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcomes using polypills for CVD risk reduction. However, a comprehensive assessment of the impact of polypills on CVD outcomes, mortality, adherence, and side effects across different settings has not previously been reported. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials examining the association between polypill therapy and CVD outcomes published before February 2021. The primary outcome of interest was the risk of major adverse CVD events (MACE). Risk ratios for dichotomous outcomes were converted to log RR and pooled using a generic inverse variance weighted random-effects model. Data for continuous outcomes were pooled using random-effects modeling and presented as mean differences with 95% CIs. Eight studies representing 25,584 patients were included for analysis. In the overall pooled analysis, the use of polypills was associated with a non-significant reduction in the risk of MACE (RR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.70–1.02) and significant reductions in the risk of all-cause mortality (RR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.81–1.00). The reductions in the risk of MACE with polypill use varied by baseline risk and nature of the study population (primary prevention vs. secondary prevention), with the most significant risk reduction among lower-risk cohorts, including within primary prevention populations [RR 0.70 (0.62, 0.79)]. Among measures of CVD risk factors, modest but significant reductions were observed for systolic and diastolic blood pressure [systolic: mean difference 1.99 mmHg (95% CI: −3.07 to −0.91); diastolic: mean difference 1.30 mmHg (95% CI: −2.42 to −0.19), but not for levels of total or low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol. Use of the polypill strategy significantly improved drug adherence (RR: 1.31; 95% CI: 1.11–1.55) with no association between polypill use and rates of adverse events or drug discontinuation. The use of polypill formulations is associated with significant reductions in CVD risk factors and the risk of all-cause mortality and MACE, particularly in the low-risk and primary prevention population.
KW - Heart disease
KW - Major adverse cardiovascular events
KW - Polypill
KW - Prevention
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85126336376&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85126336376&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.pcad.2022.01.005
DO - 10.1016/j.pcad.2022.01.005
M3 - Article
C2 - 35114251
AN - SCOPUS:85126336376
SN - 0033-0620
JO - Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases
JF - Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases
ER -