TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessing malaria risk at night-time venues in a low-transmission setting
T2 - A time-location sampling study in Zambezi, Namibia
AU - Jacobson, Jerry O.
AU - Smith, Jennifer L.
AU - Cueto, Carmen
AU - Chisenga, Mukosha
AU - Roberts, Kathryn
AU - Hsiang, Michelle
AU - Gosling, Roly
AU - Mumbengegwi, Davis
AU - Bennett, Adam
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by a Grant from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (Grant No. A122394).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Author(s).
PY - 2019/5/22
Y1 - 2019/5/22
N2 - Background: Identifying efficient and effective strategies to reach and monitor populations at greatest risk of malaria in low-transmission settings is a key challenge for malaria elimination. In Namibia's Zambezi Region, transmission is ongoing yet its drivers remain poorly understood. A growing literature suggests that night-time social activities may lead to malaria exposure that is beyond the reach of conventional preventive interventions, such as insecticide treated bed nets and indoor residual spraying. Methods: Formative research was conducted with community members in March, 2015 in the catchment areas of six randomly selected health facilities in the western Zambezi Region to identify night-time locations where large numbers of individuals regularly congregate. Using time-location sampling, a survey was conducted between March and May, 2015 at community-identified venues (bars and evening church services) to develop representative estimates of the prevalence of parasite infection and risk factors among venue-goers. Results: When compared to a contemporaneous household survey of the general population aged 15 and older (N = 1160), venue-goers (N = 480) were more likely to have spent the night away from their home recently (17.3% vs. 8.9%, P = 0.008), report recent fever (65.2% vs. 36.9%, P < 0.001), and were less likely to have sought care for fever (37.9% vs. 52.1%, P = 0.011). Venue-goers had higher, but not significantly different, rates of malaria infection (4.7% vs. 2.8%, P = 0.740). Risk factors for malaria infection among venue-goers could not be determined due to the small number of infections identified, however self-reported fever was positively associated with outdoor livelihood activities (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.9, 95% CI 1.0-3.3), not wearing protective measures at the time of the survey (AOR = 6.8, 9% CI 1.4-33.6) and having been bothered by mosquitos at the venue (AOR = 2.7, 95% CI 1.5-4). Conclusions: Prevention measures and continued surveillance at night-time venues may be a useful complement to existing malaria elimination efforts.
AB - Background: Identifying efficient and effective strategies to reach and monitor populations at greatest risk of malaria in low-transmission settings is a key challenge for malaria elimination. In Namibia's Zambezi Region, transmission is ongoing yet its drivers remain poorly understood. A growing literature suggests that night-time social activities may lead to malaria exposure that is beyond the reach of conventional preventive interventions, such as insecticide treated bed nets and indoor residual spraying. Methods: Formative research was conducted with community members in March, 2015 in the catchment areas of six randomly selected health facilities in the western Zambezi Region to identify night-time locations where large numbers of individuals regularly congregate. Using time-location sampling, a survey was conducted between March and May, 2015 at community-identified venues (bars and evening church services) to develop representative estimates of the prevalence of parasite infection and risk factors among venue-goers. Results: When compared to a contemporaneous household survey of the general population aged 15 and older (N = 1160), venue-goers (N = 480) were more likely to have spent the night away from their home recently (17.3% vs. 8.9%, P = 0.008), report recent fever (65.2% vs. 36.9%, P < 0.001), and were less likely to have sought care for fever (37.9% vs. 52.1%, P = 0.011). Venue-goers had higher, but not significantly different, rates of malaria infection (4.7% vs. 2.8%, P = 0.740). Risk factors for malaria infection among venue-goers could not be determined due to the small number of infections identified, however self-reported fever was positively associated with outdoor livelihood activities (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.9, 95% CI 1.0-3.3), not wearing protective measures at the time of the survey (AOR = 6.8, 9% CI 1.4-33.6) and having been bothered by mosquitos at the venue (AOR = 2.7, 95% CI 1.5-4). Conclusions: Prevention measures and continued surveillance at night-time venues may be a useful complement to existing malaria elimination efforts.
KW - High-risk populations
KW - Malaria
KW - Namibia
KW - Surveillance
KW - Time-location sampling
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066478224&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85066478224&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s12936-019-2807-x
DO - 10.1186/s12936-019-2807-x
M3 - Article
C2 - 31118028
AN - SCOPUS:85066478224
SN - 1475-2875
VL - 18
JO - Malaria journal
JF - Malaria journal
IS - 1
M1 - 179
ER -