An evaluation of the yellow brick road test through a full prediction-performance comparison matrix

David P. Lindeman, Henry A. Goodstein, Arlene Sachs, Clifford C. Young

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the predictive validity of the Yellow Brick Road Test (YBRT) relative to performance in reading as measured by the Metropolitan Achievement Test (MAT). A full prediction-performance comparison matrix was employed to compare three different cutoff scores for the YBRT for the identification of "at-risk" children. Four hundred and fourteen kindergarten-aged children were administered the YBRT, 214 of whom were followed to the end of second grade. It was concluded that the YBRT is a moderately valid instrument for predicting the level of reading achievement in a population with a different average performance level from the normative sample. However, the results of this study failed to support the utility of the test author's suggested use of a score of 120 as the cutoff score. Finally, it is recommended that a prediction-performance comparison study be considered standard methodology for the evaluation of the validity and efficiency of screening instruments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)111-117
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of School Psychology
Volume22
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1984

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An evaluation of the yellow brick road test through a full prediction-performance comparison matrix'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this