TY - JOUR
T1 - Advancing biomechanics laboratories capabilities
T2 - A proposed framework for in-house technology development
AU - Stevens, Wilshaw
AU - Loewen, Alex
AU - Jeans, Kelly
AU - Tulchin-Francis, Kirsten
AU - Ulman, Sophia
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to acknowledge Justine Borchard and Emma Tomes for their efforts in developing the original draft of the Coding Project Workflow, and the Scottish Rite for Children Research Program for support of this design and implementation.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2023/3
Y1 - 2023/3
N2 - Background: Technological advancements have generated more opportunities to develop/distribute custom data analysis codes (e.g., automated events, biomechanical models, etc.). Industry standards for the code development process is regularly modeled to ensure product quality and usability. Procedural project management improves efficiency of the code development process by monitoring project planning, duration, analysis, success, and maintenance. The purpose of this study was to outline in the form of guidance to research labs, a framework that standardizes the development, management, testing, and documentation of various types of data analysis codes, utilized in the motion analysis laboratory setting. Methods: This brief report outlines the workflow, briefly highlights its success a year after implementation, and provides a framework that can be adopted across laboratories of different sizes and those involved in multi-center collaborative studies. Specifically, the workflow outlined is initiated when a requestor has identified the need for a custom data analysis code. The workflow is complete and the code is released once the results of testing performed by a non-affiliated user, verifies that the code project workflow was followed appropriately, confirms a standard operating procedure has been finalized, and ensures the requestor and additional end-users are satisfied with the final product. Findings: Guidance documents and optimization of workflows are imperative for motion analysis laboratories managing numerous coding projects. Interpretation: Implementation of the proposed framework is an effective approach to reduce workload, by minimizing redundancies, maximizing on the research team's expertise and promotes collaborative input which in turn allows for feedback along the process.
AB - Background: Technological advancements have generated more opportunities to develop/distribute custom data analysis codes (e.g., automated events, biomechanical models, etc.). Industry standards for the code development process is regularly modeled to ensure product quality and usability. Procedural project management improves efficiency of the code development process by monitoring project planning, duration, analysis, success, and maintenance. The purpose of this study was to outline in the form of guidance to research labs, a framework that standardizes the development, management, testing, and documentation of various types of data analysis codes, utilized in the motion analysis laboratory setting. Methods: This brief report outlines the workflow, briefly highlights its success a year after implementation, and provides a framework that can be adopted across laboratories of different sizes and those involved in multi-center collaborative studies. Specifically, the workflow outlined is initiated when a requestor has identified the need for a custom data analysis code. The workflow is complete and the code is released once the results of testing performed by a non-affiliated user, verifies that the code project workflow was followed appropriately, confirms a standard operating procedure has been finalized, and ensures the requestor and additional end-users are satisfied with the final product. Findings: Guidance documents and optimization of workflows are imperative for motion analysis laboratories managing numerous coding projects. Interpretation: Implementation of the proposed framework is an effective approach to reduce workload, by minimizing redundancies, maximizing on the research team's expertise and promotes collaborative input which in turn allows for feedback along the process.
KW - Code development
KW - Laboratory
KW - Project management
KW - Quality assurance
KW - Usability
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85148683453&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85148683453&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2023.105908
DO - 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2023.105908
M3 - Article
C2 - 36822064
AN - SCOPUS:85148683453
SN - 0268-0033
VL - 103
JO - Clinical Biomechanics
JF - Clinical Biomechanics
M1 - 105908
ER -