TY - JOUR
T1 - Accuracy of remote chest X-ray interpretation using Google Glass technology
AU - Spaedy, Emily
AU - Christakopoulos, Georgios E.
AU - Tarar, Muhammad Nauman J
AU - Christopoulos, Georgios
AU - Rangan, Bavana V.
AU - Roesle, Michele
AU - Ochoa, Cristhiaan D.
AU - Yarbrough, William
AU - Banerjee, Subhash
AU - Brilakis, Emmanouil S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
PY - 2016/9/15
Y1 - 2016/9/15
N2 - Objectives We sought to explore the accuracy of remote chest X-ray reading using hands-free, wearable technology (Google Glass, Google, Mountain View, California). Methods We compared interpretation of twelve chest X-rays with 23 major cardiopulmonary findings by faculty and fellows from cardiology, radiology, and pulmonary-critical care via: (1) viewing the chest X-ray image on the Google Glass screen; (2) viewing a photograph of the chest X-ray taken using Google Glass and interpreted on a mobile device; (3) viewing the original chest X-ray on a desktop computer screen. One point was given for identification of each correct finding and a subjective rating of user experience was recorded. Results Fifteen physicians (5 faculty and 10 fellows) participated. The average chest X-ray reading score (maximum 23 points) as viewed through the Google Glass, Google Glass photograph on a mobile device, and the original X-ray viewed on a desktop computer was 14.1 ± 2.2, 18.5 ± 1.5 and 21.3 ± 1.7, respectively (p < 0.0001 between Google Glass and mobile device, p < 0.0001 between Google Glass and desktop computer and p = 0.0004 between mobile device and desktop computer). Of 15 physicians, 11 (73.3%) felt confident in detecting findings using the photograph taken by Google Glass as viewed on a mobile device. Conclusion Remote chest X-ray interpretation using hands-free, wearable technology (Google Glass) is less accurate than interpretation using a desktop computer or a mobile device, suggesting that further technical improvements are needed before widespread application of this novel technology.
AB - Objectives We sought to explore the accuracy of remote chest X-ray reading using hands-free, wearable technology (Google Glass, Google, Mountain View, California). Methods We compared interpretation of twelve chest X-rays with 23 major cardiopulmonary findings by faculty and fellows from cardiology, radiology, and pulmonary-critical care via: (1) viewing the chest X-ray image on the Google Glass screen; (2) viewing a photograph of the chest X-ray taken using Google Glass and interpreted on a mobile device; (3) viewing the original chest X-ray on a desktop computer screen. One point was given for identification of each correct finding and a subjective rating of user experience was recorded. Results Fifteen physicians (5 faculty and 10 fellows) participated. The average chest X-ray reading score (maximum 23 points) as viewed through the Google Glass, Google Glass photograph on a mobile device, and the original X-ray viewed on a desktop computer was 14.1 ± 2.2, 18.5 ± 1.5 and 21.3 ± 1.7, respectively (p < 0.0001 between Google Glass and mobile device, p < 0.0001 between Google Glass and desktop computer and p = 0.0004 between mobile device and desktop computer). Of 15 physicians, 11 (73.3%) felt confident in detecting findings using the photograph taken by Google Glass as viewed on a mobile device. Conclusion Remote chest X-ray interpretation using hands-free, wearable technology (Google Glass) is less accurate than interpretation using a desktop computer or a mobile device, suggesting that further technical improvements are needed before widespread application of this novel technology.
KW - Chest X-ray
KW - Interpretation
KW - Novel technology
KW - Telemedicine
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84971450024&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84971450024&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.05.070
DO - 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.05.070
M3 - Article
C2 - 27262231
AN - SCOPUS:84971450024
SN - 0167-5273
VL - 219
SP - 38
EP - 40
JO - International Journal of Cardiology
JF - International Journal of Cardiology
ER -