TY - JOUR
T1 - A systematic review of randomized trials comparing double versus triple antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention
AU - Sullivan, Alexander E.
AU - Nanna, Michael G.
AU - Rao, Sunil V.
AU - Cantrell, Sarah
AU - Gibson, C. Michael
AU - Verheugt, Freek W.A.
AU - Peterson, Eric D.
AU - Lopes, Renato D.
AU - Alexander, John H.
AU - Granger, Christopher B.
AU - Yee, Megan K.
AU - Kong, David F.
N1 - Funding Information:
Dr. Nanna is supported by NIH training grant 5-T32-HL069749-15.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
PY - 2020/8/1
Y1 - 2020/8/1
N2 - Background: Prior randomized controlled trials (RCT) evaluating the optimal antithrombotic therapies for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have not been powered to evaluate ischemic outcomes. We compared double therapy with oral anticoagulation (OAC) and a P2Y12 inhibitor to triple therapy with an OAC + dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with AF requiring PCI. Methods: Using PRISMA guidelines, we searched for RCTs including patients with AF as an indication for OAC and undergoing PCI or medical management of acute coronary syndrome. The results were pooled using fixed-effects and random-effects models to estimate the overall effect of double therapy versus triple therapy on ischemic and bleeding outcomes. Results: We identified four RCTs, comprising 10,238 patients (5,498 double therapy, 4,740 triple therapy). Trial-reported major adverse cardiovascular events were similar between double therapy and triple therapy (fixed effect model OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.94–1.26). However, stent thrombosis (61/5,496 double therapy vs. 33/4738 triple therapy; fixed effect model OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.02–2.40; number needed to treat with triple therapy = 242) favored triple therapy. Bleeding outcomes were less frequent with double therapy (746/5470 vs. 950/4710; fixed effect model OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.53–0.65; number needed to harm with triple therapy = 16), but with significant heterogeneity (Q = 8.33, p =.04; I2 = 64%), as were intracranial hemorrhages (19/5470 vs. 30/4710; fixed effect model OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.31–0.96). Conclusions: Double therapy in patients with AF requiring OAC following PCI or Acute coronary syndrome has a significantly better safety profile than triple therapy but may be associated with a modest increased risk of stent thrombosis.
AB - Background: Prior randomized controlled trials (RCT) evaluating the optimal antithrombotic therapies for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have not been powered to evaluate ischemic outcomes. We compared double therapy with oral anticoagulation (OAC) and a P2Y12 inhibitor to triple therapy with an OAC + dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with AF requiring PCI. Methods: Using PRISMA guidelines, we searched for RCTs including patients with AF as an indication for OAC and undergoing PCI or medical management of acute coronary syndrome. The results were pooled using fixed-effects and random-effects models to estimate the overall effect of double therapy versus triple therapy on ischemic and bleeding outcomes. Results: We identified four RCTs, comprising 10,238 patients (5,498 double therapy, 4,740 triple therapy). Trial-reported major adverse cardiovascular events were similar between double therapy and triple therapy (fixed effect model OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.94–1.26). However, stent thrombosis (61/5,496 double therapy vs. 33/4738 triple therapy; fixed effect model OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.02–2.40; number needed to treat with triple therapy = 242) favored triple therapy. Bleeding outcomes were less frequent with double therapy (746/5470 vs. 950/4710; fixed effect model OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.53–0.65; number needed to harm with triple therapy = 16), but with significant heterogeneity (Q = 8.33, p =.04; I2 = 64%), as were intracranial hemorrhages (19/5470 vs. 30/4710; fixed effect model OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.31–0.96). Conclusions: Double therapy in patients with AF requiring OAC following PCI or Acute coronary syndrome has a significantly better safety profile than triple therapy but may be associated with a modest increased risk of stent thrombosis.
KW - anticoagulants/antithrombins
KW - antiplatelet therapy
KW - percutaneous coronary intervention
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075215463&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85075215463&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/ccd.28535
DO - 10.1002/ccd.28535
M3 - Article
C2 - 31713326
AN - SCOPUS:85075215463
SN - 1522-1946
VL - 96
SP - E102-E109
JO - Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
JF - Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
IS - 2
ER -