TY - JOUR
T1 - A Real-Time Automated Machine Learning Algorithm for Predicting Mortality in Trauma Patients
T2 - Survey Says it’s Ready for Prime-Time
AU - Park, Caroline
AU - Loza-Avalos, Sandra E.
AU - Harvey, Jalen
AU - Hirschkorn, Carol
AU - Dultz, Linda A.
AU - Dumas, Ryan P
AU - Sanders, Drew
AU - Chowdhry, Vikas
AU - Starr, Adam
AU - Cripps, Michael W
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2023.
PY - 2024/4
Y1 - 2024/4
N2 - Background: Though artificial intelligence (“AI”) has been increasingly applied to patient care, many of these predictive models are retrospective and not readily available for real-time decision-making. This survey-based study aims to evaluate implementation of a new, validated mortality risk calculator (Parkland Trauma Index of Mortality, “PTIM”) embedded in our electronic healthrecord (“EHR”) that calculates hourly predictions of mortality with high sensitivity and specificity. Methods: This is a prospective, survey-based study performed at a level 1 trauma center. An anonymous survey was sent to surgical providers and regarding PTIM implementation. The PTIM score evaluates 23 variables including Glasgow Coma Score (GCS), vital signs, and laboratory data. Results: Of the 40 completed surveys, 35 reported using PTIM in decision-making. Prior to reviewing PTIM, providers identified perceived top 3 predictors of mortality, including GCS (22/38, 58%), age (18/35, 47%), and maximum heart rate (17/35, 45%). Most providers reported the PTIM assisted their treatment decisions (27/35, 77%) and timing of operative intervention (23/35, 66%). Many providers agreed that PTIM integrated into rounds and patient assessment (22/36, 61%) and that it improved efficiency in assessing patients’ potential mortality (21/36, 58%). Conclusions: Artificial intelligence algorithms are mostly retrospective and lag in real-time prediction of mortality. To our knowledge, this is the first real-time, automated algorithm predicting mortality in trauma patients. In this small survey-based study, we found PTIM assists in decision-making, timing of intervention, and improves accuracy in assessing mortality. Next steps include evaluating the short- and long-term impact on patient outcomes.
AB - Background: Though artificial intelligence (“AI”) has been increasingly applied to patient care, many of these predictive models are retrospective and not readily available for real-time decision-making. This survey-based study aims to evaluate implementation of a new, validated mortality risk calculator (Parkland Trauma Index of Mortality, “PTIM”) embedded in our electronic healthrecord (“EHR”) that calculates hourly predictions of mortality with high sensitivity and specificity. Methods: This is a prospective, survey-based study performed at a level 1 trauma center. An anonymous survey was sent to surgical providers and regarding PTIM implementation. The PTIM score evaluates 23 variables including Glasgow Coma Score (GCS), vital signs, and laboratory data. Results: Of the 40 completed surveys, 35 reported using PTIM in decision-making. Prior to reviewing PTIM, providers identified perceived top 3 predictors of mortality, including GCS (22/38, 58%), age (18/35, 47%), and maximum heart rate (17/35, 45%). Most providers reported the PTIM assisted their treatment decisions (27/35, 77%) and timing of operative intervention (23/35, 66%). Many providers agreed that PTIM integrated into rounds and patient assessment (22/36, 61%) and that it improved efficiency in assessing patients’ potential mortality (21/36, 58%). Conclusions: Artificial intelligence algorithms are mostly retrospective and lag in real-time prediction of mortality. To our knowledge, this is the first real-time, automated algorithm predicting mortality in trauma patients. In this small survey-based study, we found PTIM assists in decision-making, timing of intervention, and improves accuracy in assessing mortality. Next steps include evaluating the short- and long-term impact on patient outcomes.
KW - artificial intelligence
KW - machine learning
KW - trauma mortality
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85174321651&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85174321651&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/00031348231207299
DO - 10.1177/00031348231207299
M3 - Article
C2 - 37848176
AN - SCOPUS:85174321651
SN - 0003-1348
VL - 90
SP - 655
EP - 661
JO - American Surgeon
JF - American Surgeon
IS - 4
ER -