TY - JOUR
T1 - A randomized trial of strategies using darbepoetin alfa to avoid transfusions in ckd
AU - Toto, Robert
AU - Petersen, Jeffrey
AU - Berns, Jeffrey S.
AU - Lewis, Eldrin Foster
AU - Tran, Qui
AU - Weir, Matthew R.
N1 - Funding Information:
J. Berns reports being the Nephrology Subspecialty Board Chair of ABIM and the Chair of the ABIM Council, receiving honoraria from ABIM and UpTo-Date, and being the deputy editor of the American Journal of Kidney Diseases. E.F. Lewis reports receiving grants and personal fees from Amgen, and grants from Akebia, outside the submitted work. J. Petersen and Q. Tran are Amgen employees and stockholders. R. Toto reports serving as a consultant to Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, IQVIA/Akebia, Medscape, Quest Diagnostics, Quintiles, Reata, and Relypsa. M. Weir reports being on the scientific advisory board for AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, MSD, Relypsa, and Vifor, and reports receiving personal fees from Akebia/Otsuka, Boston Scientific, and Merck, outside the submitted work.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2021 by the American Society of Nephrology.
PY - 2021/2
Y1 - 2021/2
N2 - Background Exposure to high doses or a high cumulative dose of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) may contribute to cardiovascular events in patients with CKD and anemia. Whether using a low fixed ESA dose versus dosing based on a hemoglobin-based, titration-dose algorithm in such patients might reduce risks associated with high ESA doses and decrease the cumulative exposure—while reducing the need for red blood cell transfusions—is unknown. Methods In this phase-3, randomized trial involving 756 adults with stage-3 to -5 CKD and anemia, we evaluated incidence of red blood cell transfusions for participants randomized to receive darbepoetin given as a fixed dose (0.45 mg/kg every 4 weeks) versus administered according to a hemoglobin-based, titration-dose algorithm, for up to 2 years. Participants received transfusions as deemed necessary by the treating physician. Results There were 379 patients randomized to the fixed-dose group, and 377 to the titration-dose group. The percentage of participants transfused did not differ (24.1% and 24.4% for the fixed-dose and titration-dose group, respectively), with similar time to first transfusion. The titration-dose group achieved significantly higher median hemoglobin (9.9 g/dl) compared with the fixed-dose group (9.4 g/dl). The fixed-dose group had a significantly lower median cumulative dose of darbepoetin (median monthly dose of 30.9 mg) compared with the titration-dose group (53.6 mg median monthly dose). The FD and TD group received a median (Q1, Q3) cumulative dose per 4 weeks of darbepoetin of 30.9 (21.8, 40.0) mg and 53.6 (31.1, 89.9) mg, respectively; the median of the difference between treatment groups was 222.1 (95% CI, 226.1 to 218.1) mg. Conclusions These findings indicate no evidence of difference in incidence of red blood cell transfusion for a titration-dose strategy versus a fixed-dose strategy for darbepoetin. This suggests that a low fixed dose of darbepoetin may be used as an alternative to a dose-titration approach to minimize transfusions, with less cumulative dosing.
AB - Background Exposure to high doses or a high cumulative dose of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) may contribute to cardiovascular events in patients with CKD and anemia. Whether using a low fixed ESA dose versus dosing based on a hemoglobin-based, titration-dose algorithm in such patients might reduce risks associated with high ESA doses and decrease the cumulative exposure—while reducing the need for red blood cell transfusions—is unknown. Methods In this phase-3, randomized trial involving 756 adults with stage-3 to -5 CKD and anemia, we evaluated incidence of red blood cell transfusions for participants randomized to receive darbepoetin given as a fixed dose (0.45 mg/kg every 4 weeks) versus administered according to a hemoglobin-based, titration-dose algorithm, for up to 2 years. Participants received transfusions as deemed necessary by the treating physician. Results There were 379 patients randomized to the fixed-dose group, and 377 to the titration-dose group. The percentage of participants transfused did not differ (24.1% and 24.4% for the fixed-dose and titration-dose group, respectively), with similar time to first transfusion. The titration-dose group achieved significantly higher median hemoglobin (9.9 g/dl) compared with the fixed-dose group (9.4 g/dl). The fixed-dose group had a significantly lower median cumulative dose of darbepoetin (median monthly dose of 30.9 mg) compared with the titration-dose group (53.6 mg median monthly dose). The FD and TD group received a median (Q1, Q3) cumulative dose per 4 weeks of darbepoetin of 30.9 (21.8, 40.0) mg and 53.6 (31.1, 89.9) mg, respectively; the median of the difference between treatment groups was 222.1 (95% CI, 226.1 to 218.1) mg. Conclusions These findings indicate no evidence of difference in incidence of red blood cell transfusion for a titration-dose strategy versus a fixed-dose strategy for darbepoetin. This suggests that a low fixed dose of darbepoetin may be used as an alternative to a dose-titration approach to minimize transfusions, with less cumulative dosing.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100333088&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85100333088&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1681/ASN.2020050556
DO - 10.1681/ASN.2020050556
M3 - Article
C2 - 33288629
AN - SCOPUS:85100333088
SN - 1046-6673
VL - 32
SP - 469
EP - 478
JO - Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
JF - Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
IS - 2
ER -