A clinical review of structural damage in psoriatic arthritis for dermatologists: From pathogenesis to ongoing controversies

Joseph F. Merola, Soumya D. Chakravarty, Olivia Choi, Daphne Chan, Alice B. Gottlieb

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory disease that often goes unrecognized in patients with psoriasis. As a result, patients may develop significant structural damage before diagnosis and initiation of adequate treatment. Dermatologists are in an unique position to identify early signs and symptoms of PsA. Here, we briefly review the pathogenesis of PsA, differences in PsA presentation within real-world dermatology practice versus rheumatology clinical trials, and imaging modalities that can be used to assess structural damage. We then discuss several ongoing controversies related to prediction, assessment, and treatment of PsA-related structural damage. Debated questions include the following: (1) Does subclinical enthesitis predict progression from psoriasis to PsA?, (2) Does methotrexate inhibit progression of structural damage?, (3) Does structural damage correlate with clinical disease activity?, and (4) Can progression from psoriasis to PsA be prevented? Evidence presented herein suggests that dermatologists, together with rheumatologists, can play important roles in the early diagnosis and treatment of PsA, thereby potentially preventing irreversible structural damage.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)349-357
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Volume90
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2024
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • X-ray
  • magnetic resonance imaging
  • psoriasis
  • psoriatic arthritis
  • structural damage
  • ultrasound

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dermatology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A clinical review of structural damage in psoriatic arthritis for dermatologists: From pathogenesis to ongoing controversies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this