TY - JOUR
T1 - Validation of serum neurofilaments as prognostic and potential pharmacodynamic biomarkers for ALS
AU - Benatar, Michael
AU - Zhang, Lanyu
AU - Wang, Lily
AU - Granit, Volkan
AU - Statland, Jeffrey
AU - Barohn, Richard
AU - Swenson, Andrea
AU - Ravits, John
AU - Jackson, Carlayne
AU - Burns, Ted M.
AU - Trivedi, Jaya
AU - Pioro, Erik P.
AU - Caress, James
AU - Katz, Jonathan
AU - McCauley, Jacob L.
AU - Rademakers, Rosa
AU - Malaspina, Andrea
AU - Ostrow, Lyle W.
AU - Wuu, Joanne
N1 - Funding Information:
The CReATe Consortium (U54 NS090291) is part of the Rare Diseases Clinical Research Network (RDCRN), an initiative of the Office of Rare Diseases Research (ORDR), National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS). CReATe is funded through collaboration between NCATS and the National Institute of Neurologic Disorders and Stroke. CReATe is also supported by a Clinical Trial Readiness Grant from NIH (U01NS107027). Supplementary support for the CReATe Biorepository was provided by the ALS Association (Grant ID 16-TACL-242). Target ALS provided support to Quanterix and Iron Horse to cover assay costs as well as a grant to Joanne Wuu. This work was also supported by CTSA grants (UL1TR002366 and UL1TR000001) from NCATS awarded to the University of Kansas.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 American Academy of Neurology.
PY - 2020/7/7
Y1 - 2020/7/7
N2 - ObjectiveTo identify preferred neurofilament assays and clinically validate serum neurofilament light (NfL) and phosphorylated neurofilament heavy (pNfH) as prognostic and potential pharmacodynamic biomarkers relevant to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) therapy development.MethodsIn this prospective, multicenter, longitudinal observational study of patients with ALS (n = 229), primary lateral sclerosis (n = 20), and progressive muscular atrophy (n = 11), biological specimens were collected, processed, and stored according to strict standard operating procedures (SOPs). Neurofilament assays were performed in a blinded manner by independent contract research organizations.ResultsFor serum NfL and pNfH measured using the Simoa assay, there were no missing data (i.e., technical replicates below the lower limit of detection were not encountered). For the Iron Horse and Euroimmun pNfH assays, such missingness was encountered in ∼4% and ∼10% of serum samples, respectively. Mean coefficients of variation for NfL in serum and CSF were both ∼3%. Mean coefficients of variation for pNfH in serum and CSF were ∼4%-5% and ∼2%-3%, respectively, in all assays. Baseline serum NfL concentration, but not pNfH, predicted the future Revised ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R) slope and survival. Incorporation of baseline serum NfL into mixed effects models of ALSFRS-R slopes yields an estimated sample size saving of ∼8%. Depending on the method used to estimate effect size, use of serum NfL (and perhaps pNfH) as pharmacodynamic biomarkers, instead of the ALSFRS-R slope, yields significantly larger sample size savings.ConclusionsSerum NfL may be considered a clinically validated prognostic biomarker for ALS. Serum NfL (and perhaps pNfH), quantified using the Simoa assay, has potential utility as a pharmacodynamic biomarker of treatment effect.
AB - ObjectiveTo identify preferred neurofilament assays and clinically validate serum neurofilament light (NfL) and phosphorylated neurofilament heavy (pNfH) as prognostic and potential pharmacodynamic biomarkers relevant to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) therapy development.MethodsIn this prospective, multicenter, longitudinal observational study of patients with ALS (n = 229), primary lateral sclerosis (n = 20), and progressive muscular atrophy (n = 11), biological specimens were collected, processed, and stored according to strict standard operating procedures (SOPs). Neurofilament assays were performed in a blinded manner by independent contract research organizations.ResultsFor serum NfL and pNfH measured using the Simoa assay, there were no missing data (i.e., technical replicates below the lower limit of detection were not encountered). For the Iron Horse and Euroimmun pNfH assays, such missingness was encountered in ∼4% and ∼10% of serum samples, respectively. Mean coefficients of variation for NfL in serum and CSF were both ∼3%. Mean coefficients of variation for pNfH in serum and CSF were ∼4%-5% and ∼2%-3%, respectively, in all assays. Baseline serum NfL concentration, but not pNfH, predicted the future Revised ALS Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R) slope and survival. Incorporation of baseline serum NfL into mixed effects models of ALSFRS-R slopes yields an estimated sample size saving of ∼8%. Depending on the method used to estimate effect size, use of serum NfL (and perhaps pNfH) as pharmacodynamic biomarkers, instead of the ALSFRS-R slope, yields significantly larger sample size savings.ConclusionsSerum NfL may be considered a clinically validated prognostic biomarker for ALS. Serum NfL (and perhaps pNfH), quantified using the Simoa assay, has potential utility as a pharmacodynamic biomarker of treatment effect.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85088209639&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85088209639&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1212/WNL.0000000000009559
DO - 10.1212/WNL.0000000000009559
M3 - Article
C2 - 32385188
AN - SCOPUS:85088209639
SN - 0028-3878
VL - 95
SP - 59
EP - 69
JO - Neurology
JF - Neurology
IS - 1
ER -