TY - JOUR
T1 - Urothelial carcinoma
T2 - the development of FGFR inhibitors in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors
AU - Qin, Qian
AU - Patel, Vaibhav
AU - Galsky, Matthew D.
N1 - Funding Information:
MD Galsky has received grants from Merck, Dendreon, and Genentech. MD Galsky has also received personal fees from Janssen, Glaxo Smith Kline, Lilly, Astellas, Genentech, Bristol Myers, Novartis, Pfizer, EMD Serono, Astra Zeneca, Seattle Genetics, Incyte, Aileron, Dracen, Inovio, NuMab, and Dragonfly Therapeutics. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, © 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2020/6/2
Y1 - 2020/6/2
N2 - Introduction: The recent approval of erdafitinib and the emergence of other potent and selective fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitors (FGFRi’s) are shifting the treatment paradigm for patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) harboring FGFR3 alterations. Whether such therapies can, and should, be combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI’s) is an area of major research interest. Areas covered: Herein, we review the FGFR signaling pathway and impact of altered FGFR signaling on UC tumorigenesis, the clinical development of FGFRi’s, the rationale for FGFRi-ICI combinations, current trials, and future directions. Expert opinion: FGFR3 altered UCs are not less responsive to ICI’s compared with FGFR3 wild-type (WT) tumors. However, FGFR3 altered tumors may exhibit distinct immunobiology compared with WT tumors that could potentially be exploited therapeutically. Given these considerations along with the clinical non-cross resistance of these therapeutic classes, clinical investigation of regimens combining FGFR3i and ICI is warranted.
AB - Introduction: The recent approval of erdafitinib and the emergence of other potent and selective fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitors (FGFRi’s) are shifting the treatment paradigm for patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) harboring FGFR3 alterations. Whether such therapies can, and should, be combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI’s) is an area of major research interest. Areas covered: Herein, we review the FGFR signaling pathway and impact of altered FGFR signaling on UC tumorigenesis, the clinical development of FGFRi’s, the rationale for FGFRi-ICI combinations, current trials, and future directions. Expert opinion: FGFR3 altered UCs are not less responsive to ICI’s compared with FGFR3 wild-type (WT) tumors. However, FGFR3 altered tumors may exhibit distinct immunobiology compared with WT tumors that could potentially be exploited therapeutically. Given these considerations along with the clinical non-cross resistance of these therapeutic classes, clinical investigation of regimens combining FGFR3i and ICI is warranted.
KW - Bladder Cancer
KW - combination
KW - fgfr
KW - fgfr Inhibitor
KW - immune Checkpoint Inhibitor
KW - tumor Microenvironment
KW - urothelial Carcinoma
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85087153826&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85087153826&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/14737140.2020.1770600
DO - 10.1080/14737140.2020.1770600
M3 - Review article
C2 - 32436413
AN - SCOPUS:85087153826
SN - 1473-7140
VL - 20
SP - 503
EP - 512
JO - Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy
JF - Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy
IS - 6
ER -