TY - JOUR
T1 - « Un degré de séparation »
T2 - Une évaluation par méthodes mixtes des expériences des utilisateurs et des prestataires canadiens de soins de santé mentale à distance durant la COVID-19
AU - Ceniti, Amanda K.
AU - Abdelmoemin, Wegdan R.
AU - Ho, Keith
AU - Kang, Yudi
AU - Placenza, Franca
AU - Laframboise, Rachel
AU - Bhat, Venkat
AU - Foster, Jane A.
AU - Frey, Benicio N.
AU - Lam, Raymond W.
AU - Milev, Roumen
AU - Rotzinger, Susan
AU - Soares, Claudio N.
AU - Uher, Rudolf
AU - Kennedy, Sidney H.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Ms. Ceniti, Dr. Abdelmoemin, Mr. Ho, Ms. Kang, Dr. Placenza, Ms. Laframboise, and Dr. Bhat have no conflicts of interest. Dr. Lam reports receiving honoraria or research funds from Allergan, Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, BC Leading Edge Foundation, CIHR, CANMAT, Healthy Minds Canada, Janssen, Lundbeck, Lundbeck Institute, MITACS, Myriad Neuroscience, Ontario Brain Institute, Otsuka, Pfizer, Unity Health, and the VGH-UBCH Foundation. Dr. Milev reports receiving consulting and speaking honoraria from AbbVie, Allergan, Eisai, Janssen, KYE, Lallemand, Lundbeck, Otsuka, and Sunovion, and research grants from CAN-BIND, CIHR, Janssen, Lallemand, Lundbeck, Nubiyota, OBI and OMHF. Dr. Foster, Dr. Frey, Dr. Rotzinger, Dr. Soares, and Dr. Uher have no conflicts of interest. Dr. Kennedy reports research funding or honoraria from Abbott, Alkermes, Allergan, Boehringer Ingelheim, Brain Canada, Canadian Institutes for Health Research, Janssen, Lundbeck, Lundbeck Institute, Ontario Brain Institute, Ontario Research Fund, Otsuka, Pfizer, Servier, Sunovion, and Sun Pharmaceuticals, and holds stock in Field Trip Health.
Funding Information:
The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This research was conducted as part of CAN-BIND, an Integrated Discovery Program supported by the Ontario Brain Institute, which is an independent non-profit corporation, funded partially by the Ontario government. The opinions, results, and conclusions are those of the authors and no endorsement by the Ontario Brain Institute is intended or should be inferred.
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2022.
PY - 2022/9
Y1 - 2022/9
N2 - Objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic has contributed to a shift from in-person to remote mental health care. While remote care methods have long existed, their widespread use is unprecedented. There is little research about mental health care user and provider experiences with this transition, and no published studies to date have compared satisfaction between these groups. Methods: Canadian mental health care users (n = 332) and providers (n = 107) completed an online self-report survey from October 2020 to February 2021 hosted by the Canadian Biomarker Integration Network in Depression. Using a mixed-methods approach, participants were asked about their use of remote care, including satisfaction, barriers to use, helpful and unhelpful factors, and suggestions for improvement. Results: Overall, 59% to 63% of health care users and 59% of health care providers were satisfied with remote care. Users reported the greatest satisfaction with the convenience of remote care, while providers were most satisfied with the speed of provision of care; all groups were least satisfied with therapeutic rapport. Health care providers were less satisfied with the user-friendliness of remote care (P < 0.001) than users, while health care users were less satisfied than providers with continuity of care (P < 0.001). The use of a video-based platform was associated with remote care satisfaction among health care users (P < 0.02), and qualitative responses support the importance of visual cues in maintaining therapeutic rapport remotely. The majority of users (55%) and providers (87%) reported a likelihood of using remote care after the pandemic. Conclusions: Remote mental health care is generally accepted by both users and providers, and the majority would consider using remote care following the pandemic. Suggestions for improvement include greater use of video, increased attention to body language and eye contact, consistency with in-person care, as well as increased provider training and administrative support.
AB - Objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic has contributed to a shift from in-person to remote mental health care. While remote care methods have long existed, their widespread use is unprecedented. There is little research about mental health care user and provider experiences with this transition, and no published studies to date have compared satisfaction between these groups. Methods: Canadian mental health care users (n = 332) and providers (n = 107) completed an online self-report survey from October 2020 to February 2021 hosted by the Canadian Biomarker Integration Network in Depression. Using a mixed-methods approach, participants were asked about their use of remote care, including satisfaction, barriers to use, helpful and unhelpful factors, and suggestions for improvement. Results: Overall, 59% to 63% of health care users and 59% of health care providers were satisfied with remote care. Users reported the greatest satisfaction with the convenience of remote care, while providers were most satisfied with the speed of provision of care; all groups were least satisfied with therapeutic rapport. Health care providers were less satisfied with the user-friendliness of remote care (P < 0.001) than users, while health care users were less satisfied than providers with continuity of care (P < 0.001). The use of a video-based platform was associated with remote care satisfaction among health care users (P < 0.02), and qualitative responses support the importance of visual cues in maintaining therapeutic rapport remotely. The majority of users (55%) and providers (87%) reported a likelihood of using remote care after the pandemic. Conclusions: Remote mental health care is generally accepted by both users and providers, and the majority would consider using remote care following the pandemic. Suggestions for improvement include greater use of video, increased attention to body language and eye contact, consistency with in-person care, as well as increased provider training and administrative support.
KW - COVID-19
KW - mental health
KW - remote care
KW - telemental health
KW - telepsychiatry
KW - virtual care
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85122412193&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85122412193&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/07067437211070656
DO - 10.1177/07067437211070656
M3 - Article
C2 - 34986035
AN - SCOPUS:85122412193
SN - 0706-7437
VL - 67
SP - 712
EP - 722
JO - Canadian Journal of Psychiatry
JF - Canadian Journal of Psychiatry
IS - 9
ER -