Trends in urologic oncology clinical practice and medical education under COVID-19 pandemic: An international survey of senior clinical and academic urologists

Barak Rosenzweig, Axel Bex, Zohar A. Dotan, Mark Frydenberg, Laurence Klotz, Yair Lotan, Claude C. Schulman, Igor Tsaur, Jacob Ramon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations


Objective: Ad-hoc guidelines for managing the COVID-19 pandemic are published worldwide. We investigated international applications of such policies in the urologic-oncology community. Methods: A 20-item survey was e-mailed via SurveyMonkey to 100 international senior urologic-oncology surgeons. Leaders’ policies regarding clinical/surgical management and medical education were surveyed probing demographics, affiliations, urologic-oncologic areas of interest, and current transportation restrictions. Data on COVID-19 burden were retrieved from the ECDC. Statistical analyses employed non-parametric tests (SPSS v.25.0, IBM). Results: Of 100 leaders from 17 countries, 63 responded to our survey, with 58 (92%) reporting university and/or cancer-center affiliations. Policies on new-patient visits remained mostly unchanged, while follow-up visits for low-risk diseases were mostly postponed, for example, 83.3% for small renal mass (SRM). Radical prostatectomy was delayed in 76.2% of cases, while maintaining scheduled timing for radical cystectomy (71.7%). Delays were longer in Europe than in the Americas for kidney cancer (SRM follow-up, P = 0.014), prostate cancer (new visits, P = 0.003), and intravesical therapy for intermediate-risk bladder cancer (P = 0.043). In Europe, COVID-19 burden correlated with policy adaptation, for example, nephrectomy delays for T2 disease (r = 0.5, P =0.005). Regarding education policies, trainees’ medical education was mainly unchanged, whereas senior urologists' planned attendance at professional meetings dropped from 6 (IQR 1−11) to 2 (IQR 0−5) (P < 0.0001). Conclusion: Under COVID-19, senior urologic-oncology surgeons worldwide apply risk-stratified approaches to timing of clinical and surgical schedules. Policies regarding trainee education were not significantly affected. We suggest establishment of an international consortium to create a directive for coping with such future challenges to global healthcare.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)929.e1-929.e10
JournalUrologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations
Issue number12
StatePublished - Dec 2020


  • Bladder cancer
  • COVID-19 pandemic
  • Kidney cancer
  • Medical education
  • Policy
  • Prostate cancer
  • Testicular cancer
  • Urologic oncology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Urology


Dive into the research topics of 'Trends in urologic oncology clinical practice and medical education under COVID-19 pandemic: An international survey of senior clinical and academic urologists'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this