TY - JOUR
T1 - The role of biomarkers to diagnose diabetic foot osteomyelitis. A meta-analysis
AU - Van Asten, Suzanne Aura Victoria
AU - Geradus Peters, Edgar Joseph
AU - Xi, Yin
AU - Lavery, Lawrence Alfred
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Bentham Science Publishers.
PY - 2016/12/1
Y1 - 2016/12/1
N2 - Purpose: To systematically review the value of serum inflammatory markers to diagnose diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO). Study selection: Studies to diagnose DFO using biomarkers erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), interleukins (IL-2, IL-6, IL-8) and tumor necrosis factor alfa (TNFα) were retrieved from EMBASE and PubMed with no language restrictions through July 2014. Data extraction: We summarized clinical characteristics of the studies and used bivariate random effects models and summary receiver operating characteristic curves to estimate sensitivity and specificity for each marker. Data synthesis: A total of 8 qualifying studies were included in our meta-analysis. Bivariate pooled sensitivity and specificity of the 6 studies examining ESR were 0.81 (95% CI 0.71-0.88) and 0.90 (95% CI 0.75-0.96) respectively. Due to the paucity of data, models did not converge for the other biomarkers. Conclusions: From the inflammatory markers, ESR appears to be the best laboratory test to identify patients with DFO.
AB - Purpose: To systematically review the value of serum inflammatory markers to diagnose diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO). Study selection: Studies to diagnose DFO using biomarkers erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), interleukins (IL-2, IL-6, IL-8) and tumor necrosis factor alfa (TNFα) were retrieved from EMBASE and PubMed with no language restrictions through July 2014. Data extraction: We summarized clinical characteristics of the studies and used bivariate random effects models and summary receiver operating characteristic curves to estimate sensitivity and specificity for each marker. Data synthesis: A total of 8 qualifying studies were included in our meta-analysis. Bivariate pooled sensitivity and specificity of the 6 studies examining ESR were 0.81 (95% CI 0.71-0.88) and 0.90 (95% CI 0.75-0.96) respectively. Due to the paucity of data, models did not converge for the other biomarkers. Conclusions: From the inflammatory markers, ESR appears to be the best laboratory test to identify patients with DFO.
KW - Biomarkers
KW - C-reactive protein
KW - Diabetic foot
KW - Diabetic foot infection
KW - Diagnosis
KW - Erythrocyte sedimentation rate
KW - Osteomyelitis
KW - Procalcitonin
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84995677848&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84995677848&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2174/1573399811666150713104401
DO - 10.2174/1573399811666150713104401
M3 - Review article
C2 - 26166314
AN - SCOPUS:84995677848
SN - 1573-3998
VL - 12
SP - 396
EP - 402
JO - Current Diabetes Reviews
JF - Current Diabetes Reviews
IS - 4
ER -