TY - JOUR
T1 - The Resident-Run Minor Surgery Clinic
T2 - A Pilot Study to Safely Increase Operative Autonomy
AU - Wojcik, Brandon M.
AU - Fong, Zhi Ven
AU - Patel, Madhukar S.
AU - Chang, David C.
AU - Petrusa, Emil
AU - Mullen, John T.
AU - Phitayakorn, Roy
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Association of Program Directors in Surgery
PY - 2016/11/1
Y1 - 2016/11/1
N2 - Objective General surgery training has evolved to align with changes in work hour restrictions, supervision regulations, and reimbursement practices. This has culminated in a lack of operative autonomy, leaving residents feeling inadequately prepared to perform surgery independently when beginning fellowship or practice. A resident-run minor surgery clinic increases junior resident autonomy, but its effects on patient outcomes have not been formally established. This pilot study evaluated the safety of implementing a resident-run minor surgery clinic within a university-based general surgery training program. Design Single institution case-control pilot study of a resident-run minor surgery clinic from 9/2014 to 6/2015. Rotating third-year residents staffed the clinic once weekly. Residents performed operations independently in their own procedure room. A supervising attending surgeon staffed each case prior to residents performing the procedure and viewed the surgical site before wound closure. Postprocedure patient complications and admissions to the hospital because of a complication were analyzed and compared with an attending control cohort. Setting Massachusetts General Hospital General in Boston, MA; an academic tertiary care general surgery residency program. Participants Ten third-year general surgery residents. Results Overall, 341 patients underwent a total of 399 procedures (110 in the resident clinic vs. 289 in the attending clinic). Minor surgeries included soft tissue mass excision (n = 275), abscess incision and drainage (n = 66), skin lesion excision (n = 37), skin tag removal (n = 15), and lymph node excision (n = 6). There was no significant difference in the overall rate of patients developing a postprocedure complication within 30 days (3.6% resident vs. 2.8% attending; p = 0.65); which persisted on multivariate analysis. Similar findings were observed for the rate of hospital admission resulting from a complication. Resident evaluations overwhelmingly supported the rotation, citing increased operative autonomy as the greatest strength. Conclusions Implementation of a resident-run minor surgery clinic is a safe and effective method to increase trainee operative autonomy. The rotation is well suited for mid-level residents, as it provides an opportunity for realistic self-evaluation and focused learning that may enhance their operative experience during senior level rotations.
AB - Objective General surgery training has evolved to align with changes in work hour restrictions, supervision regulations, and reimbursement practices. This has culminated in a lack of operative autonomy, leaving residents feeling inadequately prepared to perform surgery independently when beginning fellowship or practice. A resident-run minor surgery clinic increases junior resident autonomy, but its effects on patient outcomes have not been formally established. This pilot study evaluated the safety of implementing a resident-run minor surgery clinic within a university-based general surgery training program. Design Single institution case-control pilot study of a resident-run minor surgery clinic from 9/2014 to 6/2015. Rotating third-year residents staffed the clinic once weekly. Residents performed operations independently in their own procedure room. A supervising attending surgeon staffed each case prior to residents performing the procedure and viewed the surgical site before wound closure. Postprocedure patient complications and admissions to the hospital because of a complication were analyzed and compared with an attending control cohort. Setting Massachusetts General Hospital General in Boston, MA; an academic tertiary care general surgery residency program. Participants Ten third-year general surgery residents. Results Overall, 341 patients underwent a total of 399 procedures (110 in the resident clinic vs. 289 in the attending clinic). Minor surgeries included soft tissue mass excision (n = 275), abscess incision and drainage (n = 66), skin lesion excision (n = 37), skin tag removal (n = 15), and lymph node excision (n = 6). There was no significant difference in the overall rate of patients developing a postprocedure complication within 30 days (3.6% resident vs. 2.8% attending; p = 0.65); which persisted on multivariate analysis. Similar findings were observed for the rate of hospital admission resulting from a complication. Resident evaluations overwhelmingly supported the rotation, citing increased operative autonomy as the greatest strength. Conclusions Implementation of a resident-run minor surgery clinic is a safe and effective method to increase trainee operative autonomy. The rotation is well suited for mid-level residents, as it provides an opportunity for realistic self-evaluation and focused learning that may enhance their operative experience during senior level rotations.
KW - autonomy
KW - deliberate practice model
KW - graduate medical education
KW - minor surgery
KW - Patient Care, Medical Knowledge
KW - patient outcomes
KW - Practice-Based Learning and Improvement
KW - resident clinic
KW - Systems-Based Practice
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84997611177&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84997611177&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.08.016
DO - 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.08.016
M3 - Review article
C2 - 27886972
AN - SCOPUS:84997611177
SN - 1931-7204
VL - 73
SP - e142-e149
JO - Journal of Surgical Education
JF - Journal of Surgical Education
IS - 6
ER -