TY - JOUR
T1 - The Past Informs the Present, Academic New Media Pitfalls
T2 - A Primer for Plastic Surgeons
AU - Day, Kristopher M.
AU - Rohrich, Rod J.
AU - Spiess, Alexander M.
N1 - Funding Information:
Catalogues thousands of journals labeled as predatory to researchers Integrates publication platforms for publicly funded research to increase access Educational resources to foster ethical scientific publishing Nonprofit originator of CC licenses, enabling copyright sharing Updated status of an article’s corrections or retractions by Cross Ref An International DOI Foundation official object identifier by PILA Community-curated online open access jour-nals index Biomedical editors and society members for publication quality International standard-setting body composed of various national organizations Nonprofit organization that registers interoper-able digital network identifiers Publication of journals’ statistics, including impact factors by Clarivate Analytics Branch of the National Library of Medicine, a part of the National Institute of Health Designs the PMH for metadata harvesting of open access indexes, effectively linking them Digital identifier distinguishing each researcher
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2019 The Authors.
PY - 2019/4/1
Y1 - 2019/4/1
N2 - Mass communication has undergone a "new media" revolution, which includes the rise of digital, online, and social media. The impact of new media on academic processes, however, has been underappreciated. The rise of Web-based virtual platforms has profoundly impacted the way plastic surgeons publish, store, exchange, and analyze scholarly biomedical information. This new media academic phenomenon refers to electronic mechanisms with the capacity to supplant traditional publication methods, which typically rely on printed documents in the physical domain. Although such tools can be efficient and user-friendly, they also make users vulnerable to exploitation. Notable examples reveal a relative lack of regulation, oversight, reliable rating scales, user authentication, and ethical accountability in the virtual space. As with any new technique, education is key and knowledge is power. In this article, online resources related to healthcare and the practice of plastic surgery are reviewed and summarized, including open access, mega-indices, whitelists, and electronic alerts. New media provides powerful knowledge-sharing tools that can help execute scholarly endeavors, communicate between professionals, and educate the public. However, it is essential for plastic surgeons to appreciate the caveats of new media academic processes to avoid unscrupulous practices of those that may seek to manipulate these Web-based systems. This article outlines the key pitfalls associated with online information streams to better inform plastic surgeons how to navigate new media-based scholarly processes.
AB - Mass communication has undergone a "new media" revolution, which includes the rise of digital, online, and social media. The impact of new media on academic processes, however, has been underappreciated. The rise of Web-based virtual platforms has profoundly impacted the way plastic surgeons publish, store, exchange, and analyze scholarly biomedical information. This new media academic phenomenon refers to electronic mechanisms with the capacity to supplant traditional publication methods, which typically rely on printed documents in the physical domain. Although such tools can be efficient and user-friendly, they also make users vulnerable to exploitation. Notable examples reveal a relative lack of regulation, oversight, reliable rating scales, user authentication, and ethical accountability in the virtual space. As with any new technique, education is key and knowledge is power. In this article, online resources related to healthcare and the practice of plastic surgery are reviewed and summarized, including open access, mega-indices, whitelists, and electronic alerts. New media provides powerful knowledge-sharing tools that can help execute scholarly endeavors, communicate between professionals, and educate the public. However, it is essential for plastic surgeons to appreciate the caveats of new media academic processes to avoid unscrupulous practices of those that may seek to manipulate these Web-based systems. This article outlines the key pitfalls associated with online information streams to better inform plastic surgeons how to navigate new media-based scholarly processes.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073569510&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85073569510&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002178
DO - 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002178
M3 - Article
C2 - 31321180
AN - SCOPUS:85073569510
SN - 2169-7574
VL - 7
JO - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open
JF - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open
IS - 4
M1 - e2178
ER -