TY - JOUR
T1 - The microbiome of diabetic foot osteomyelitis
AU - van Asten, S. A V
AU - La Fontaine, J.
AU - Peters, E. J G
AU - Bhavan, K.
AU - Kim, P. J.
AU - Lavery, L. A.
N1 - Funding Information:
Financial support for this work was provided by the NIDDK Diabetic Complications Consortium (DiaComp, www.diacomp.org ), grant DK076169. SAVvA collected clinical data and wrote the manuscript. JLF collected data and edited the manuscript. EJGP edited the manuscript. KB was a co-investigator and edited the manuscript. PJK edited the manuscript. LAL collected data and contributed to the manuscript. LAL is the guarantor of this work and takes responsibility for the content of the article. The authors are grateful to Dr. J. Delton Hanson and PathoGenius Laboratories for their contribution and assistance with this manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2015, The Author(s).
PY - 2016/2/1
Y1 - 2016/2/1
N2 - The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the diversity of bacteria in diabetic foot osteomyelitis using a 16S rRNA sequencing approach and to compare the results with conventional culture techniques. In this prospective observational study, we obtained 34 bone samples from patients admitted to our hospital with a moderate–severe diabetic foot infection. We analysed the distribution of the 16S rRNA gene sequences in the bone samples, using an Illumina MiSeq Personal Sequencer. We compared the genera that were detected with the cultured pathogens in the bone samples with conventional techniques. In the 23 samples that had positive results with both techniques, Staphylococcus, Corynebacterium, Streptococcus and Propionibacterium spp. were detected in 20, 18, 13 and 11 samples, respectively. Significantly more anaerobes were detected with 16S rRNA sequencing compared to conventional techniques (86.9 % vs. 23.1 %, p = 0.001) and more Gram-positive bacilli were present (78.3 % vs. 3.8 %, p < 0.001). Staphylococcus spp. were identified in all of the sequenced bone samples that were negative with conventional techniques. Mixed genera were present in 83.3 % (5 of 6) of the negative samples. Anaerobic and fastidious organisms may play a more significant role in osteomyelitis than previously reported. Further studies with larger populations are needed in order to fully understand the clinical importance of the microbial diversity of diabetic foot osteomyelitis.
AB - The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the diversity of bacteria in diabetic foot osteomyelitis using a 16S rRNA sequencing approach and to compare the results with conventional culture techniques. In this prospective observational study, we obtained 34 bone samples from patients admitted to our hospital with a moderate–severe diabetic foot infection. We analysed the distribution of the 16S rRNA gene sequences in the bone samples, using an Illumina MiSeq Personal Sequencer. We compared the genera that were detected with the cultured pathogens in the bone samples with conventional techniques. In the 23 samples that had positive results with both techniques, Staphylococcus, Corynebacterium, Streptococcus and Propionibacterium spp. were detected in 20, 18, 13 and 11 samples, respectively. Significantly more anaerobes were detected with 16S rRNA sequencing compared to conventional techniques (86.9 % vs. 23.1 %, p = 0.001) and more Gram-positive bacilli were present (78.3 % vs. 3.8 %, p < 0.001). Staphylococcus spp. were identified in all of the sequenced bone samples that were negative with conventional techniques. Mixed genera were present in 83.3 % (5 of 6) of the negative samples. Anaerobic and fastidious organisms may play a more significant role in osteomyelitis than previously reported. Further studies with larger populations are needed in order to fully understand the clinical importance of the microbial diversity of diabetic foot osteomyelitis.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84955670661&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84955670661&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10096-015-2544-1
DO - 10.1007/s10096-015-2544-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 26670675
AN - SCOPUS:84955670661
SN - 0934-9723
VL - 35
SP - 293
EP - 298
JO - European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases
JF - European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases
IS - 2
ER -